Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 11 Jul 2022 15:59:41 +0100 | From | Sudeep Holla <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] riscv: topology: fix default topology reporting |
| |
On Sat, Jul 09, 2022 at 04:23:55PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote: > From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> > > RISC-V has no sane defaults to fall back on where there is no cpu-map > in the devicetree. > Without sane defaults, the package, core and thread IDs are all set to > -1. This causes user-visible inaccuracies for tools like hwloc/lstopo > which rely on the sysfs cpu topology files to detect a system's > topology. > > On a PolarFire SoC, which should have 4 harts with a thread each, > lstopo currently reports: > > Machine (793MB total) > Package L#0 > NUMANode L#0 (P#0 793MB) > Core L#0 > L1d L#0 (32KB) + L1i L#0 (32KB) + PU L#0 (P#0) > L1d L#1 (32KB) + L1i L#1 (32KB) + PU L#1 (P#1) > L1d L#2 (32KB) + L1i L#2 (32KB) + PU L#2 (P#2) > L1d L#3 (32KB) + L1i L#3 (32KB) + PU L#3 (P#3) > > Adding calls to store_cpu_topology() in {boot,smp} hart bringup code > results in the correct topolgy being reported: > > Machine (793MB total) > Package L#0 > NUMANode L#0 (P#0 793MB) > L1d L#0 (32KB) + L1i L#0 (32KB) + Core L#0 + PU L#0 (P#0) > L1d L#1 (32KB) + L1i L#1 (32KB) + Core L#1 + PU L#1 (P#1) > L1d L#2 (32KB) + L1i L#2 (32KB) + Core L#2 + PU L#2 (P#2) > L1d L#3 (32KB) + L1i L#3 (32KB) + Core L#3 + PU L#3 (P#3) > > CC: stable@vger.kernel.org > Fixes: 03f11f03dbfe ("RISC-V: Parse cpu topology during boot.") > Reported-by: Brice Goglin <Brice.Goglin@inria.fr> > Link: https://github.com/open-mpi/hwloc/issues/536 > Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> > --- > --- > arch/riscv/Kconfig | 2 +- > arch/riscv/kernel/smpboot.c | 4 +++- > 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kconfig b/arch/riscv/Kconfig > index 2af0701b7518..4b6c2fdbb57c 100644 > --- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig > +++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig > @@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ config RISCV > select COMMON_CLK > select CPU_PM if CPU_IDLE > select EDAC_SUPPORT > - select GENERIC_ARCH_TOPOLOGY if SMP > + select GENERIC_ARCH_TOPOLOGY
I am not sure of !SMP as ARM64 is default SMP only. I have never reviewed the arch topology code with !SMP considered. I will leave that part to RISC-V developers.
> select GENERIC_ATOMIC64 if !64BIT > select GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS_BROADCAST if SMP > select GENERIC_EARLY_IOREMAP > diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/smpboot.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/smpboot.c > index f1e4948a4b52..a1c861f84fe2 100644 > --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/smpboot.c > +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/smpboot.c > @@ -40,6 +40,8 @@ static DECLARE_COMPLETION(cpu_running); > void __init smp_prepare_boot_cpu(void) > { > init_cpu_topology(); > + > + store_cpu_topology(smp_processor_id()); > } > > void __init smp_prepare_cpus(unsigned int max_cpus) > @@ -161,9 +163,9 @@ asmlinkage __visible void smp_callin(void) > mmgrab(mm); > current->active_mm = mm; > > + store_cpu_topology(curr_cpuid); > notify_cpu_starting(curr_cpuid); > numa_add_cpu(curr_cpuid); > - update_siblings_masks(curr_cpuid); > set_cpu_online(curr_cpuid, 1); > > /*
Other than that, this looks good. FWIW: Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
-- Regards, Sudeep
| |