lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Jul]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 3/5] iio: pressure: bmp280: simplify driver initialization logic
From
Date
On dom, 2022-07-10 at 21:41 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> It seems you somehow managed to send patches separately from email
> perspective.
> Make sure you pass parameter --thread to `git format-patch`, so it will create
> a proper chain of emails.

How should I proceed to fix this issue? Should I wait for more feedback and send
a new revision of the patches, now as a proper mail chain? Or should I resend
current patchset as a chain? I don't want to spam the mailing list more due to
my inexperience contributing.

> On Sun, Jul 10, 2022 at 11:17:06AM +0200, Angel Iglesias wrote:
> > Simplified common initialization logic of different sensor types
> > unifying calibration and initial configuration recovery.
> >
> > Default config param values of each sensor type are stored inside
> > chip_info structure and used to initialize sensor data struct instance.
> >
> > The auxiliar functions for read each sensor type calibration are converted
> > to a callback available on the chip_info struct.
>
> > Signed-off-by: Angel Iglesias <ang.iglesiasg@gmail.com>
> > Suggested-by: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
>
> Usually this kind of tag goes before your SoB, because it's chronologically
> correct.
>
Ok, makes sense.

Thank you for your time and help,

Best regards,
Angel

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-07-11 14:47    [W:1.539 / U:0.008 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site