Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 10 Jul 2022 22:21:33 +0900 | From | Dominique Martinet <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] net/9p: Initialize the iounit field during fid creation |
| |
Tyler Hicks wrote on Sat, Jul 09, 2022 at 03:00:05PM -0500: > Ensure that the fid's iounit field is set to zero when a new fid is > created. Certain 9P operations, such as OPEN and CREATE, allow the > server to reply with an iounit size which the client code assigns to the > fid struct shortly after the fid is created in p9_fid_create(). Other > operations that follow a call to p9_fid_create(), such as an XATTRWALK, > don't include an iounit value in the reply message from the server. In > the latter case, the iounit field remained uninitialized. Depending on > allocation patterns, the iounit value could have been something > reasonable that was carried over from previously freed fids or, in the > worst case, could have been arbitrary values from non-fid related usages > of the memory location. > > The bug was detected in the Windows Subsystem for Linux 2 (WSL2) kernel > after the uninitialized iounit field resulted in the typical sequence of > two getxattr(2) syscalls, one to get the size of an xattr and another > after allocating a sufficiently sized buffer to fit the xattr value, to > hit an unexpected ERANGE error in the second call to getxattr(2). An > uninitialized iounit field would sometimes force rsize to be smaller > than the xattr value size in p9_client_read_once() and the 9P server in > WSL refused to chunk up the READ on the attr_fid and, instead, returned > ERANGE to the client. The virtfs server in QEMU seems happy to chunk up > the READ and this problem goes undetected there. However, there are > likely other non-xattr implications of this bug that could cause > inefficient communication between the client and server. > > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org > Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.microsoft.com>
Thanks for the fix!
> --- > > Note that I haven't had a chance to identify when this bug was > introduced so I don't yet have a proper Fixes tag. The history looked a > little tricky to me but I'll have another look in the coming days. We > started hitting this bug after trying to move from linux-5.10.y to > linux-5.15.y but I didn't see any obvious changes between those two > series. I'm not confident of this theory but perhaps the fid refcounting > changes impacted the fid allocation patterns enough to uncover the > latent bug? > > net/9p/client.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/net/9p/client.c b/net/9p/client.c > index 8bba0d9cf975..1dfceb9154f7 100644 > --- a/net/9p/client.c > +++ b/net/9p/client.c > @@ -899,6 +899,7 @@ static struct p9_fid *p9_fid_create(struct p9_client *clnt) > fid->clnt = clnt; > fid->rdir = NULL; > fid->fid = 0; > + fid->iounit = 0;
ugh, this isn't the first we've missed so I'll be tempted to agree with Christophe -- let's make that a kzalloc and only set non-zero fields.
-- Dominique
| |