Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 10 Jun 2022 00:02:56 +0200 (CEST) | From | Jan Engelhardt <> | Subject | Re: RFC: Ioctl v2 |
| |
On Friday 2022-05-20 18:16, Kent Overstreet wrote: >Problems with ioctls: > >* There's no namespacing, and ioctl numbers clash > >IOCTL v2 proposal: > >* Namespacing > >To solve the namespacing issue, I want to steal an approach I've seen from >OpenGL, where extensions are namespaced: an extension will be referenced by name >where the name is vendor.foo, and when an extension becomes standard it gets a >new name (arb.foo instead of nvidia.foo, I think? it's been awhile). >To do this we'll need to define ioctls by name, not by hardcoded number, [...]
https://www.khronos.org/registry/vulkan/specs/1.3-extensions/man/html/VK_NV_glsl_shader.html Right there on the front matter: "Registered number #13".
https://www.khronos.org/registry/vulkan/specs/1.3/styleguide.html "All extensions must be registered with Khronos." "Each extension is assigned a range of values that can be used to create globally-unique enum values"
| |