lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Jun]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRE: [PATCH v9 7/8] PCI: imx6: Move the phy driver callbacks to the proper places
Date
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
> Sent: 2022年6月9日 2:58
> To: Hongxing Zhu <hongxing.zhu@nxp.com>
> Cc: l.stach@pengutronix.de; bhelgaas@google.com; robh+dt@kernel.org;
> broonie@kernel.org; lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com; jingoohan1@gmail.com;
> festevam@gmail.com; francesco.dolcini@toradex.com;
> linux-pci@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org;
> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; kernel@pengutronix.de; dl-linux-imx
> <linux-imx@nxp.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 7/8] PCI: imx6: Move the phy driver callbacks to the
> proper places
>
> On Fri, May 06, 2022 at 09:47:08AM +0800, Richard Zhu wrote:
> > To make it more reasonable, move the phy_power_on/phy_init callbacks
> > to the proper places.
> > - move the phy_power_on() out of imx6_pcie_clk_enable().
> > - move the phy_init() out of imx6_pcie_deassert_core_reset().
>
> I'm not sure what "make it more reasonable" is telling me. In subject line and
> commit log, please say something more specific than "the proper places."
>
> It's probably more important to say where they are moving *to* than where
> they're moving *out of*.
Thanks for your comments.
In another review loop listed below, Lucas used said that it's not good to hide
PHY init in imx6_pcie_assert_core_reset()
So, I make a try to move the phy_init() out of imx6_pcie_assert_core_reset().
And move phy_power_on() out of imx6_pcie_clk_enable() accordingly.
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-pci/patch/1646289275-17813-1-git-send-email-hongxing.zhu@nxp.com/
Okay, I would specific that they are moving *to* later.

>
> > In order to save power consumption, turn off the clocks and regulators
> > when the imx6_pcie_host_init() return error.
>
> Is the power savings the *reason* for this change? I can't tell from the
> commit log.
The error handling of the imx6_pcie_host_init() is not mentioned in the subject.
Should I split these changes into two patches?

Best Regards
Richard Zhu
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-06-09 08:21    [W:0.140 / U:0.340 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site