lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Jun]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v10 18/21] drm/mediatek: Add mt8195 Embedded DisplayPort driver
From
Date
On Tue, 2022-06-07 at 15:47 +0800, CK Hu wrote:
> Hi, Rex:
>
> On Mon, 2022-05-23 at 12:47 +0200, Guillaume Ranquet wrote:
> > From: Markus Schneider-Pargmann <msp@baylibre.com>
> >
> > This patch adds a DisplayPort driver for the Mediatek mt8195 SoC.
> >
> > It supports the mt8195, the embedded DisplayPort units. It offers
> > DisplayPort 1.4 with up to 4 lanes.
> >
> > The driver creates a child device for the phy. The child device
> > will
> > never exist without the parent being active. As they are sharing a
> > register range, the parent passes a regmap pointer to the child so
> > that
> > both can work with the same register range. The phy driver sets
> > device
> > data that is read by the parent to get the phy device that can be
> > used
> > to control the phy properties.
> >
> > This driver is based on an initial version by
> > Jason-JH.Lin <jason-jh.lin@mediatek.com>.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Markus Schneider-Pargmann <msp@baylibre.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Guillaume Ranquet <granquet@baylibre.com>
> > ---
>
> [snip]
>
> > +
> > +static int mtk_dp_hpd_sink_event(struct mtk_dp *mtk_dp)
> > +{
> > + ssize_t ret;
> > + u8 sink_count;
> > + bool locked;
> > + u8 link_status[DP_LINK_STATUS_SIZE] = {};
> > + u32 sink_count_reg = DP_SINK_COUNT_ESI;
> > + u32 link_status_reg = DP_LANE0_1_STATUS;
> > +
> > + ret = drm_dp_dpcd_readb(&mtk_dp->aux, sink_count_reg,
> > &sink_count);
> > + if (ret < 0) {
> > + drm_err(mtk_dp->drm_dev, "Read sink count failed:
> > %ld\n", ret);
> > + return ret;
> > + }
> > +
> > + ret = drm_dp_dpcd_read(&mtk_dp->aux, link_status_reg,
> > link_status,
> > + sizeof(link_status));
> > + if (!ret) {
> > + drm_err(mtk_dp->drm_dev, "Read link status failed:
> > %ld\n",
> > + ret);
> > + return ret;
> > + }
> > +
> > + locked = drm_dp_channel_eq_ok(link_status,
> > + mtk_dp->train_info.lane_count);
> > + if (!locked && mtk_dp->train_state >
> > MTK_DP_TRAIN_STATE_TRAINING_PRE)
>
> Before enter this function, mtk_dp->train_state is set to
> MTK_DP_TRAIN_STATE_STARTUP, so this never happen, drop this.
>

The interrupt from sink device could come any time. Why it's
impossible?

> > + mtk_dp->train_state = MTK_DP_TRAIN_STATE_TRAINING_PRE;
> > +
> > + if (link_status[1] & DP_REMOTE_CONTROL_COMMAND_PENDING)
> > + drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&mtk_dp->aux,
> > DP_DEVICE_SERVICE_IRQ_VECTOR,
> > + DP_REMOTE_CONTROL_COMMAND_PENDING);
> > +
> > + if (DP_GET_SINK_COUNT(sink_count) &&
> > + (link_status[2] & DP_DOWNSTREAM_PORT_STATUS_CHANGED)) {
> > + mtk_dp->train_info.check_cap_count = 0;
> > + mtk_dp->train_state = MTK_DP_TRAIN_STATE_CHECKEDID;
>
> Why change state from MTK_DP_TRAIN_STATE_STARTUP to
> MTK_DP_TRAIN_STATE_CHECKEDID? In mtk_dp_train_handler(),
> mtk_dp_parse_capabilities() is true then change to
> MTK_DP_TRAIN_STATE_CHECKEDID. Give a reason why these two are
> different.
>
> Regards,
> CK
>

I will drop this and drop state of MTK_DP_TRAIN_STATE_CHECKEDID.
MTK_DP_TRAIN_STATE_CHECKEDID is only used for audio.
We can check enable status in another place.

BRs,
Bo-Chen

> > + msleep(20);
> > + }
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
>
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-06-08 12:41    [W:0.309 / U:1.084 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site