lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Jun]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 03/12] irqchip: mips-gic: Introduce gic_with_each_online_cpu()
On Wed, 25 May 2022 13:10:21 +0100,
Dragan Mladjenovic <Dragan.Mladjenovic@syrmia.com> wrote:
>
> From: Paul Burton <paulburton@kernel.org>
>
> A few pieces of code in the MIPS GIC driver operate on the GIC local
> register block for each online CPU, accessing each via the GIC's
> other/redirect register block. This patch abstracts the process of
> iterating over online CPUs & configuring the other/redirect region to
> access their registers through a new gic_with_each_online_cpu() macro.
>
> This simplifies users of the new macro slightly, and more importantly
> prepares us for handling multi-cluster systems where the register
> configuration will be done via the CM's GCR_CL_REDIRECT register. By
> abstracting all other/redirect block configuration through this macro,
> and the __gic_with_next_online_cpu() function which backs it, users will
> trivially gain support for multi-cluster when it is implemented in
> __gic_with_next_online_cpu().
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Burton <paulburton@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Chao-ying Fu <cfu@wavecomp.com>
> Signed-off-by: Dragan Mladjenovic <dragan.mladjenovic@syrmia.com>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-mips-gic.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-mips-gic.c
> index ff89b36267dd..4872bebe24cf 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-mips-gic.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-mips-gic.c
> @@ -65,6 +65,45 @@ static struct gic_all_vpes_chip_data {
> bool mask;
> } gic_all_vpes_chip_data[GIC_NUM_LOCAL_INTRS];
>
> +static int __gic_with_next_online_cpu(int prev)
> +{
> + unsigned int cpu;
> +
> + /* Discover the next online CPU */
> + cpu = cpumask_next(prev, cpu_online_mask);
> +
> + /* If there isn't one, we're done */
> + if (cpu >= nr_cpu_ids)
> + return cpu;
> +
> + /*
> + * Lock access to the next CPU's GIC local register block.
> + *
> + * In the single cluster case we simply set GIC_VL_OTHER. The caller
> + * holds gic_lock so nothing can clobber the value we write.
> + */
> + write_gic_vl_other(mips_cm_vp_id(cpu));
> +
> + return cpu;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * gic_with_each_online_cpu() - Iterate over online CPUs, access local registers
> + * @cpu: An integer variable to hold the current CPU number
> + *
> + * Iterate over online CPUs & configure the other/redirect register region to
> + * access each CPUs GIC local register block, which can be accessed from the
> + * loop body using read_gic_vo_*() or write_gic_vo_*() accessor functions or
> + * their derivatives.
> + *
> + * The caller must hold gic_lock throughout the loop, such that GIC_VL_OTHER
> + * cannot be clobbered.
> + */
> +#define gic_with_each_online_cpu(cpu) \

nit: please keep the kernel convention of using 'for_each'. This makes
it far easier to grep for such iterators when doing bulk refactoring.

Also, since there is a requirement to hold the gic_lock, please add a
lockdep_assert_held() in the loop so that it can be checked with a
lockdep kernel.

> + for ((cpu) = __gic_with_next_online_cpu(-1); \
> + (cpu) = __gic_with_next_online_cpu(cpu), \
> + (cpu) < nr_cpu_ids;)
> +
> static void gic_clear_pcpu_masks(unsigned int intr)
> {
> unsigned int i;
> @@ -357,10 +396,8 @@ static void gic_mask_local_irq_all_vpes(struct irq_data *d)
> cd->mask = false;
>
> spin_lock_irqsave(&gic_lock, flags);
> - for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
> - write_gic_vl_other(mips_cm_vp_id(cpu));
> + gic_with_each_online_cpu(cpu)
> write_gic_vo_rmask(BIT(intr));
> - }
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gic_lock, flags);
> }
>
> @@ -375,10 +412,8 @@ static void gic_unmask_local_irq_all_vpes(struct irq_data *d)
> cd->mask = true;
>
> spin_lock_irqsave(&gic_lock, flags);
> - for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
> - write_gic_vl_other(mips_cm_vp_id(cpu));
> + gic_with_each_online_cpu(cpu)
> write_gic_vo_smask(BIT(intr));
> - }
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gic_lock, flags);
> }
>
> @@ -532,10 +567,8 @@ static int gic_irq_domain_map(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int virq,
> return -EPERM;
>
> spin_lock_irqsave(&gic_lock, flags);
> - for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
> - write_gic_vl_other(mips_cm_vp_id(cpu));
> + gic_with_each_online_cpu(cpu)
> write_gic_vo_map(mips_gic_vx_map_reg(intr), map);
> - }
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gic_lock, flags);
>
> return 0;

Thanks,

M.

--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-06-06 15:08    [W:0.227 / U:0.024 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site