lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Jun]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 4/4] cpumask: Update cpumask_next_wrap() signature
On Sun, Jun 05, 2022 at 08:22:41AM +0200, Sander Vanheule wrote:
> The extern specifier is not needed for this declaration, so drop it. The
> function also depends only on the input parameters, and has no side
> effects, so it can be marked __pure like other functions in cpumask.h

Missed period.

Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>

> Signed-off-by: Sander Vanheule <sander@svanheule.net>
> ---
> include/linux/cpumask.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/cpumask.h b/include/linux/cpumask.h
> index 7ccddbc27ac3..f37ce00741a3 100644
> --- a/include/linux/cpumask.h
> +++ b/include/linux/cpumask.h
> @@ -210,7 +210,7 @@ int cpumask_any_distribute(const struct cpumask *srcp);
> (cpu) = cpumask_next_zero((cpu), (mask)), \
> (cpu) < nr_cpu_ids;)
>
> -extern int cpumask_next_wrap(int n, const struct cpumask *mask, int start, bool wrap);
> +int __pure cpumask_next_wrap(int n, const struct cpumask *mask, int start, bool wrap);
>
> /**
> * for_each_cpu_wrap - iterate over every cpu in a mask, starting at a specified location
> --
> 2.36.1
>

--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-06-06 12:43    [W:0.218 / U:0.304 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site