lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Jun]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH v3 1/4] cpumask: Fix invalid uniprocessor mask assumption
Date
On uniprocessor builds, any CPU mask is assumed to contain exactly one
CPU (cpu0). This assumption ignores the existence of empty masks,
resulting in incorrect behaviour.
cpumask_first_zero(), cpumask_next_zero(), and for_each_cpu_not() don't
provide behaviour matching the assumption that a UP mask is always "1",
and instead provide behaviour matching the empty mask.

Drop the incorrectly optimised code and use the generic implementations
in all cases.

Signed-off-by: Sander Vanheule <sander@svanheule.net>
---
Changes since v1:
- Drop UP implementations instead of trying to fix them
---
include/linux/cpumask.h | 80 -----------------------------------------
lib/Makefile | 3 +-
2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 82 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/cpumask.h b/include/linux/cpumask.h
index fe29ac7cc469..d6add0e29ef4 100644
--- a/include/linux/cpumask.h
+++ b/include/linux/cpumask.h
@@ -116,85 +116,6 @@ static __always_inline unsigned int cpumask_check(unsigned int cpu)
return cpu;
}

-#if NR_CPUS == 1
-/* Uniprocessor. Assume all masks are "1". */
-static inline unsigned int cpumask_first(const struct cpumask *srcp)
-{
- return 0;
-}
-
-static inline unsigned int cpumask_first_zero(const struct cpumask *srcp)
-{
- return 0;
-}
-
-static inline unsigned int cpumask_first_and(const struct cpumask *srcp1,
- const struct cpumask *srcp2)
-{
- return 0;
-}
-
-static inline unsigned int cpumask_last(const struct cpumask *srcp)
-{
- return 0;
-}
-
-/* Valid inputs for n are -1 and 0. */
-static inline unsigned int cpumask_next(int n, const struct cpumask *srcp)
-{
- return n+1;
-}
-
-static inline unsigned int cpumask_next_zero(int n, const struct cpumask *srcp)
-{
- return n+1;
-}
-
-static inline unsigned int cpumask_next_and(int n,
- const struct cpumask *srcp,
- const struct cpumask *andp)
-{
- return n+1;
-}
-
-static inline unsigned int cpumask_next_wrap(int n, const struct cpumask *mask,
- int start, bool wrap)
-{
- /* cpu0 unless stop condition, wrap and at cpu0, then nr_cpumask_bits */
- return (wrap && n == 0);
-}
-
-/* cpu must be a valid cpu, ie 0, so there's no other choice. */
-static inline unsigned int cpumask_any_but(const struct cpumask *mask,
- unsigned int cpu)
-{
- return 1;
-}
-
-static inline unsigned int cpumask_local_spread(unsigned int i, int node)
-{
- return 0;
-}
-
-static inline int cpumask_any_and_distribute(const struct cpumask *src1p,
- const struct cpumask *src2p) {
- return cpumask_first_and(src1p, src2p);
-}
-
-static inline int cpumask_any_distribute(const struct cpumask *srcp)
-{
- return cpumask_first(srcp);
-}
-
-#define for_each_cpu(cpu, mask) \
- for ((cpu) = 0; (cpu) < 1; (cpu)++, (void)mask)
-#define for_each_cpu_not(cpu, mask) \
- for ((cpu) = 0; (cpu) < 1; (cpu)++, (void)mask)
-#define for_each_cpu_wrap(cpu, mask, start) \
- for ((cpu) = 0; (cpu) < 1; (cpu)++, (void)mask, (void)(start))
-#define for_each_cpu_and(cpu, mask1, mask2) \
- for ((cpu) = 0; (cpu) < 1; (cpu)++, (void)mask1, (void)mask2)
-#else
/**
* cpumask_first - get the first cpu in a cpumask
* @srcp: the cpumask pointer
@@ -324,7 +245,6 @@ extern int cpumask_next_wrap(int n, const struct cpumask *mask, int start, bool
for ((cpu) = -1; \
(cpu) = cpumask_next_and((cpu), (mask1), (mask2)), \
(cpu) < nr_cpu_ids;)
-#endif /* SMP */

#define CPU_BITS_NONE \
{ \
diff --git a/lib/Makefile b/lib/Makefile
index 89fcae891361..6f26a429115b 100644
--- a/lib/Makefile
+++ b/lib/Makefile
@@ -34,10 +34,9 @@ lib-y := ctype.o string.o vsprintf.o cmdline.o \
is_single_threaded.o plist.o decompress.o kobject_uevent.o \
earlycpio.o seq_buf.o siphash.o dec_and_lock.o \
nmi_backtrace.o nodemask.o win_minmax.o memcat_p.o \
- buildid.o
+ buildid.o cpumask.o

lib-$(CONFIG_PRINTK) += dump_stack.o
-lib-$(CONFIG_SMP) += cpumask.o

lib-y += kobject.o klist.o
obj-y += lockref.o
--
2.36.1
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-06-05 08:23    [W:0.292 / U:0.424 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site