lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Jun]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH] mm/slub: enable debugging memory wasting of kmalloc
From
On 2022-06-30 03:47, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Jun 2022 10:38:44 +0800 Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Andrew,
>>
>> Thanks for the review!
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 07:30:06PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>>> On Thu, 30 Jun 2022 09:47:15 +0800 Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> kmalloc's API family is critical for mm, with one shortcoming that
>>>> its object size is fixed to be power of 2. When user requests memory
>>>> for '2^n + 1' bytes, actually 2^(n+1) bytes will be allocated, so
>>>> in worst case, there is around 50% memory space waste.
>>>>
>>>> We've met a kernel boot OOM panic, and from the dumped slab info:
>>>>
>>>> [ 26.062145] kmalloc-2k 814056KB 814056KB
>>>>
>>>> >From debug we found there are huge number of 'struct iova_magazine',
>>>> whose size is 1032 bytes (1024 + 8), so each allocation will waste
>>>> 1016 bytes. Though the issue is solved by giving the right(bigger)
>>>> size of RAM, it is still better to optimize the size (either use
>>>> a kmalloc friendly size or create a dedicated slab for it).
>>>
>>> Well that's nice, and additional visibility is presumably a good thing.
>>>
>>> But what the heck is going on with iova_magazine? Is anyone looking at
>>> moderating its impact?
>>
>> Yes, I have a very simple patch at hand
>>
>> --- a/drivers/iommu/iova.c
>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/iova.c
>> @@ -614,7 +614,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(reserve_iova);
>> * dynamic size tuning described in the paper.
>> */
>>
>> -#define IOVA_MAG_SIZE 128
>> +#define IOVA_MAG_SIZE 127
>
> Well OK. Would benefit from a comment explaining the reasoning.
>
> But we still have eleventy squillion of these things in flight. Why?

They're storage for a per-CPU caching scheme - for n CPUs, there should
currently be (2n + 32) * 6 in flight, since there's one set for each of
6 sizes. The 32 really should be n or 2n as well since it's needlessly
large for small systems and a bottleneck for large ones, but it needs
some unpicking to allow for dynamic allocations.

Thanks,
Robin.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-06-30 10:53    [W:0.060 / U:0.144 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site