Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 29 Jun 2022 17:50:17 +0100 | Subject | Re: [PATCH v6 0/4] Rewrite jevents program in python | From | John Garry <> |
| |
On 29/06/2022 17:47, Ian Rogers wrote: > On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 10:27 AM John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com> wrote: >> >> On 27/06/2022 03:57, Ian Rogers wrote: >>> A challenge with this code is in avoiding regressions. For this reason >>> the jevents.py produces identical output to jevents.c, validated with a >>> test script and build target. >>> >>> v6. Adds Tested-by from Zhengjun Xing<zhengjun.xing@linux.intel.com> >>> and Thomas Richter<tmricht@linux.ibm.com>. Fixes issues spotted >>> by Jiri Olsa<jolsa@kernel.org>, jsmn.c wasn't deleted and the >>> empty pmu-events.c didn't pass the pmu-events test. It also adds a >>> missing mkdir which is necessary before creating pmu-events.c and >>> tweaks the quiet display code in the empty case to display a gen. >>> v5. Adds a 2>/dev/null as suggested by David Laight >> >> >> Hmmm... shouldn't this be v7? Anyway what I got with message-id >> 20220627025744.106527-1-irogers@google.com now seems to build and the >> output looks ok. >> >> Thanks, >> John > > Thanks John, I think I've confused myself by working on greater than 1 > machine wrt version numbers. I can re-send as v7, would it be okay to > put on a Tested-by: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com> ? > Sure,
Tested-by: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com> > .
| |