Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | Andy Shevchenko <> | Subject | [PATCH v2 07/11] mfd: intel_soc_pmic_bxtwc: Drop redundant ACPI_PTR() | Date | Wed, 29 Jun 2022 01:17:43 +0300 |
| |
The driver depends on ACPI (via MFD_INTEL_PMC_BXT), ACPI_PTR() resolution is always the same. Otherwise a compiler may produce a warning.
That said, the rule of thumb either ugly ifdeffery with ACPI_PTR or none should be used in a driver.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Acked-for-MFD-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> --- v2: added tag (Lee)
drivers/mfd/intel_soc_pmic_bxtwc.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mfd/intel_soc_pmic_bxtwc.c b/drivers/mfd/intel_soc_pmic_bxtwc.c index 7c3ce440c826..f79ae0ddc495 100644 --- a/drivers/mfd/intel_soc_pmic_bxtwc.c +++ b/drivers/mfd/intel_soc_pmic_bxtwc.c @@ -573,7 +573,7 @@ static struct platform_driver bxtwc_driver = { .driver = { .name = "BXTWC PMIC", .pm = pm_sleep_ptr(&bxtwc_pm_ops), - .acpi_match_table = ACPI_PTR(bxtwc_acpi_ids), + .acpi_match_table = bxtwc_acpi_ids, .dev_groups = bxtwc_groups, }, }; -- 2.35.1
| |