lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Jun]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH v2 07/11] mfd: intel_soc_pmic_bxtwc: Drop redundant ACPI_PTR()
Date
The driver depends on ACPI (via MFD_INTEL_PMC_BXT), ACPI_PTR() resolution
is always the same. Otherwise a compiler may produce a warning.

That said, the rule of thumb either ugly ifdeffery with ACPI_PTR or
none should be used in a driver.

Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Acked-for-MFD-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
---
v2: added tag (Lee)

drivers/mfd/intel_soc_pmic_bxtwc.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mfd/intel_soc_pmic_bxtwc.c b/drivers/mfd/intel_soc_pmic_bxtwc.c
index 7c3ce440c826..f79ae0ddc495 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/intel_soc_pmic_bxtwc.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/intel_soc_pmic_bxtwc.c
@@ -573,7 +573,7 @@ static struct platform_driver bxtwc_driver = {
.driver = {
.name = "BXTWC PMIC",
.pm = pm_sleep_ptr(&bxtwc_pm_ops),
- .acpi_match_table = ACPI_PTR(bxtwc_acpi_ids),
+ .acpi_match_table = bxtwc_acpi_ids,
.dev_groups = bxtwc_groups,
},
};
--
2.35.1
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-06-29 00:24    [W:0.101 / U:0.328 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site