Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 29 Jun 2022 02:57:17 +0900 | From | Tejun Heo <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v3] sched/core: add forced idle accounting for cgroups |
| |
Hello,
On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 03:35:21PM -0700, Josh Don wrote: > > Would it make sense to namespace the name to reflect the fact that > > this is tied to core scheduling? e.g. something like > > core.force_idle_usec (and yeah, underscore between words, please). I > > kinda hate that the feature is named "core". The word is so > > overloaded. > > Sure, although a namespace of "core_sched" would be a bit clearer, > since as you point out "core" is pretty overloaded :)
Yeah, core_sched is probabaly better and hopefully it'll get better as we get used to the name.
> Lack of underscore for forceidle was to be consistent with > "core_forceidle_sum" being dumped from /proc/pid/sched, but I'm fine > with it either way. > > So, > > core_sched.force_idle_usec ?
Yeah, that'd be my preference.
Thanks.
-- tejun
| |