Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | menglong8.dong@gmail ... | Subject | [PATCH net-next] net: mptcp: fix some spelling mistake in mptcp | Date | Mon, 27 Jun 2022 20:16:25 +0800 |
| |
From: Menglong Dong <imagedong@tencent.com>
codespell finds some spelling mistake in mptcp:
net/mptcp/subflow.c:1624: interaces ==> interfaces net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c:1130: regarless ==> regardless
Just fix them.
Signed-off-by: Menglong Dong <imagedong@tencent.com> --- net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c | 2 +- net/mptcp/subflow.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c b/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c index e099f2a12504..3de83e2a2611 100644 --- a/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c +++ b/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c @@ -1127,7 +1127,7 @@ void mptcp_pm_nl_subflow_chk_stale(const struct mptcp_sock *msk, struct sock *ss } unlock_sock_fast(ssk, slow); - /* always try to push the pending data regarless of re-injections: + /* always try to push the pending data regardless of re-injections: * we can possibly use backup subflows now, and subflow selection * is cheap under the msk socket lock */ diff --git a/net/mptcp/subflow.c b/net/mptcp/subflow.c index 654cc602ff2c..8c3e699d3387 100644 --- a/net/mptcp/subflow.c +++ b/net/mptcp/subflow.c @@ -1621,7 +1621,7 @@ int mptcp_subflow_create_socket(struct sock *sk, struct socket **new_sock) /* the newly created socket really belongs to the owning MPTCP master * socket, even if for additional subflows the allocation is performed * by a kernel workqueue. Adjust inode references, so that the - * procfs/diag interaces really show this one belonging to the correct + * procfs/diag interfaces really show this one belonging to the correct * user. */ SOCK_INODE(sf)->i_ino = SOCK_INODE(sk->sk_socket)->i_ino; -- 2.36.1
| |