[lkml]   [2022]   [Jun]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: possible trace_printk() bug in v5.19-rc1
On Mon, 20 Jun 2022 00:57:23 +0000
Chuck Lever III <> wrote:

> > Yes, I'm sure. I just checked out v5.18 and built it with the
> > same CONFIG. trace_printk() on that kernel generates function
> > names as expected.
> I moved my development work to another system, and bisected. The
> result:
> 91fb02f31505 ("module: Move kallsyms support into a separate file")

Hmm, right below that it says:

"No functional change."

I'm guessing it may not be as reliably reproducible.

And is this an issue with trace-cmd output or reading the trace file?

-- Steve

 \ /
  Last update: 2022-06-25 01:09    [W:0.082 / U:1.764 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site