Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | Subject | [RFC PATCH 5/8] rxrpc: Implement sendfile() support | From | David Howells <> | Date | Thu, 23 Jun 2022 14:29:26 +0100 |
| |
Implement the sendpage protocol operation so that sendfile() will work directly with AF_RXRPC calls. To use sendfile() to communicate with a call requires the call to be specified beforehand with setsockopt():
setsockopt(client, SOL_RXRPC, RXRPC_SELECT_CALL_FOR_SEND, &call_id, sizeof(call_id)); sendfile(client, source, &pos, st.st_size);
The specified call ID can be cleared:
call_id = 0; setsockopt(client, SOL_RXRPC, RXRPC_SELECT_CALL_FOR_SEND, &call_id, sizeof(call_id));
or changed.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> ---
net/rxrpc/af_rxrpc.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- net/rxrpc/ar-internal.h | 2 ++ net/rxrpc/sendmsg.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/rxrpc/af_rxrpc.c b/net/rxrpc/af_rxrpc.c index 8ac014aff7a2..41420c456e77 100644 --- a/net/rxrpc/af_rxrpc.c +++ b/net/rxrpc/af_rxrpc.c @@ -798,6 +798,44 @@ static int rxrpc_bind_channel(struct rxrpc_sock *rx2, int fd) return ret; } +/* + * Splice into a call. The call to send as part of must have been set with + * setsockopt(RXRPC_SELECT_CALL_FOR_SEND). + */ +static ssize_t rxrpc_sendpage(struct socket *sock, struct page *page, int offset, + size_t size, int flags) +{ + struct rxrpc_sock *rx = rxrpc_sk(sock->sk); + struct rxrpc_call *call; + ssize_t ret; + + _enter("{%d},,%u,%zu,%x", rx->sk.sk_state, offset, size, flags); + + lock_sock(&rx->sk); + + read_lock_bh(&rx->recvmsg_lock); + call = rx->selected_send_call; + if (!call) { + read_unlock_bh(&rx->recvmsg_lock); + release_sock(&rx->sk); + return -EBADSLT; + } + + rxrpc_get_call(call, rxrpc_call_got); + read_unlock_bh(&rx->recvmsg_lock); + + ret = mutex_lock_interruptible(&call->user_mutex); + release_sock(&rx->sk); + if (ret == 0) { + ret = rxrpc_do_sendpage(rx, call, page, offset, size, flags); + mutex_unlock(&call->user_mutex); + } + + rxrpc_put_call(call, rxrpc_call_put); + _leave(" = %zd", ret); + return ret; +} + /* * Set the default call for 'targetless' operations such as splice(), SIOCINQ * and SIOCOUTQ and also as a filter for recvmsg(). Calling this function @@ -1279,9 +1317,9 @@ static const struct proto_ops rxrpc_rpc_ops = { .setsockopt = rxrpc_setsockopt, .getsockopt = rxrpc_getsockopt, .sendmsg = rxrpc_sendmsg, + .sendpage = rxrpc_sendpage, .recvmsg = rxrpc_recvmsg, .mmap = sock_no_mmap, - .sendpage = sock_no_sendpage, }; static struct proto rxrpc_proto = { diff --git a/net/rxrpc/ar-internal.h b/net/rxrpc/ar-internal.h index ec2c614082b9..bec398c66341 100644 --- a/net/rxrpc/ar-internal.h +++ b/net/rxrpc/ar-internal.h @@ -1107,6 +1107,8 @@ struct key *rxrpc_look_up_server_security(struct rxrpc_connection *, * sendmsg.c */ int rxrpc_do_sendmsg(struct rxrpc_sock *, struct msghdr *, size_t); +ssize_t rxrpc_do_sendpage(struct rxrpc_sock *, struct rxrpc_call *, + struct page *, int, size_t, int); /* * server_key.c diff --git a/net/rxrpc/sendmsg.c b/net/rxrpc/sendmsg.c index 1d38e279e2ef..77699008c428 100644 --- a/net/rxrpc/sendmsg.c +++ b/net/rxrpc/sendmsg.c @@ -762,6 +762,45 @@ int rxrpc_do_sendmsg(struct rxrpc_sock *rx, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len) return ret; } +/* + * Handle data input from a splice. The call to send as part of must have been + * set with setsockopt(RXRPC_SELECT_CALL_FOR_SEND). + */ +ssize_t rxrpc_do_sendpage(struct rxrpc_sock *rx, struct rxrpc_call *call, + struct page *page, int offset, size_t size, int flags) +{ + struct bio_vec bv = { + .bv_page = page, + .bv_offset = offset, + .bv_len = size, + }; + struct msghdr msg = { + .msg_flags = flags, + }; + + _enter(",,%lx,%u,%zu,%x", page->index, offset, size, flags); + + switch (READ_ONCE(call->state)) { + case RXRPC_CALL_COMPLETE: + return -ESHUTDOWN; + default: + return -EPROTO; + case RXRPC_CALL_CLIENT_SEND_REQUEST: + case RXRPC_CALL_SERVER_ACK_REQUEST: + case RXRPC_CALL_SERVER_SEND_REPLY: + break; + } + + /* Ideally, we'd allow sendfile() to end the Tx phase - but there's no + * way for userspace to communicate this option through that syscall. + */ + //if (flags & MSG_SENDPAGE_NOTLAST) + msg.msg_flags |= MSG_MORE; + + iov_iter_bvec(&msg.msg_iter, WRITE, &bv, 1, size); + return rxrpc_send_data(rx, call, &msg, size, NULL); +} + /** * rxrpc_kernel_send_data - Allow a kernel service to send data on a call * @sock: The socket the call is on
| |