lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Jun]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 0/4] memblock tests: add VERBOSE and MEMBLOCK_DEBUG Makefile options
On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 11:20:11PM -0500, Rebecca Mckeever wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 08:30:36PM -0700, Ira Weiny wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 04:29:05AM -0500, Rebecca Mckeever wrote:
> > > These patches add options VERBOSE and MEMBLOCK_DEBUG to Memblock
> > > simulator, which can be specified when running make. These patches also
> > > implement the functionality for these options.
> >
> > I seem to be missing patch 3/4 and I don't see it on lore?
> >
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/004e021cc3cb7be8749361b3b1cb324459b9cb9f.1655889641.git.remckee0@gmail.com/
> >
> > Did it get sent? Did it define the ASSERT_*() macros?

I see it on lore in both linux-mm and linux-kernel, and here as well:

https://lore.kernel.org/all/39c5c97d2b5c1ab88b7bbbf02633f840fd5dfcdf.1655889641.git.remckee0@gmail.com/

> That's strange, my email shows that it was sent to linux-mm@kvack.org and
> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org but I'm not seeing it on lore either.
> Should I resend just patch 3/4?

No need to resend.

> For now, you can take a look at v1. Patch 3 is unchanged from v1, which
> is showing up on lore:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/fe34452209f54287023ccacd666eade81ecd9a24.1655878337.git.remckee0@gmail.com/T/#u
>
> It does not define the ASSERT_*() macros, that happens in patch 2.
> Patch 3 implements MEMBLOCK_DEBUG.
>
> Thanks,
> Rebecca
>

--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-06-23 06:51    [W:0.160 / U:0.816 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site