lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Jun]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH Part2 v6 04/49] x86/sev: set SYSCFG.MFMD
On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 4:02 PM Ashish Kalra <Ashish.Kalra@amd.com> wrote:
>
> From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
>
> SEV-SNP FW >= 1.51 requires that SYSCFG.MFMD must be set.
>
> Subsequent CCP patches while require 1.51 as the minimum SEV-SNP
> firmware version.
>
> Signed-off-by: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h | 3 +++
> arch/x86/kernel/sev.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h
> index 57a8280e283a..1e36f16daa56 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h
> @@ -587,6 +587,9 @@
> #define MSR_AMD64_SYSCFG_SNP_EN BIT_ULL(MSR_AMD64_SYSCFG_SNP_EN_BIT)
> #define MSR_AMD64_SYSCFG_SNP_VMPL_EN_BIT 25
> #define MSR_AMD64_SYSCFG_SNP_VMPL_EN BIT_ULL(MSR_AMD64_SYSCFG_SNP_VMPL_EN_BIT)
> +#define MSR_AMD64_SYSCFG_MFDM_BIT 19
> +#define MSR_AMD64_SYSCFG_MFDM BIT_ULL(MSR_AMD64_SYSCFG_MFDM_BIT)

nit: Similar to the previous patch, the alignment here doesn't look
right. The bad alignment can be viewed on the github version of this
patch:
https://github.com/AMDESE/linux/commit/6d4469b86f90e67119ff110230857788a0d9dbd0

> +
> #define MSR_K8_INT_PENDING_MSG 0xc0010055
> /* C1E active bits in int pending message */
> #define K8_INTP_C1E_ACTIVE_MASK 0x18000000
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/sev.c b/arch/x86/kernel/sev.c
> index 3a233b5d47c5..25c7feb367f6 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/sev.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/sev.c
> @@ -2257,6 +2257,27 @@ static __init void snp_enable(void *arg)
> __snp_enable(smp_processor_id());
> }
>
> +static int __mfdm_enable(unsigned int cpu)
> +{
> + u64 val;
> +
> + if (!cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_SEV_SNP))
> + return 0;
> +
> + rdmsrl(MSR_AMD64_SYSCFG, val);
> +
> + val |= MSR_AMD64_SYSCFG_MFDM;

Can we do this inside `__snp_enable()`, above? Then, we'll execute if
a hotplug event happens as well.

static int __snp_enable(unsigned int cpu)
{
u64 val;

if (!cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_SEV_SNP))
return 0;

rdmsrl(MSR_AMD64_SYSCFG, val);

val |= MSR_AMD64_SYSCFG_SNP_EN;
val |= MSR_AMD64_SYSCFG_SNP_VMPL_EN;
val |= MSR_AMD64_SYSCFG_MFDM;

wrmsrl(MSR_AMD64_SYSCFG, val);

return 0;
}

> +
> + wrmsrl(MSR_AMD64_SYSCFG, val);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static __init void mfdm_enable(void *arg)
> +{
> + __mfdm_enable(smp_processor_id());
> +}
> +
> static bool get_rmptable_info(u64 *start, u64 *len)
> {
> u64 calc_rmp_sz, rmp_sz, rmp_base, rmp_end, nr_pages;
> @@ -2325,6 +2346,9 @@ static __init int __snp_rmptable_init(void)
> /* Flush the caches to ensure that data is written before SNP is enabled. */
> wbinvd_on_all_cpus();
>
> + /* MFDM must be enabled on all the CPUs prior to enabling SNP. */
> + on_each_cpu(mfdm_enable, NULL, 1);
> +
> /* Enable SNP on all CPUs. */
> on_each_cpu(snp_enable, NULL, 1);
>
> --
> 2.25.1
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-06-23 23:01    [W:1.638 / U:3.424 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site