lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Jun]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] workqueue: Make create_worker() safe against spurious wakeups
On Thu 23-06-22 09:00:12, Petr Mladek wrote:
> On Wed 2022-06-22 16:08:53, Petr Mladek wrote:
> > A system crashed with the following BUG() report:
> >
> > [115147.050484] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000000
> > [115147.050488] #PF: supervisor write access in kernel mode
> > [115147.050489] #PF: error_code(0x0002) - not-present page
> > [115147.050490] PGD 0 P4D 0
> > [115147.050494] Oops: 0002 [#1] PREEMPT_RT SMP NOPTI
> > [115147.050498] CPU: 1 PID: 16213 Comm: kthreadd Kdump: loaded Tainted: G O X 5.3.18-2-rt #1 SLE15-SP2 (unreleased)
> > [115147.050510] RIP: 0010:_raw_spin_lock_irq+0x14/0x30
> > [115147.050513] Code: 89 c6 e8 5f 7a 9b ff 66 90 c3 66 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 90 0f 1f 44 00 00 fa 65 ff 05 fb 53 6c 55 31 c0 ba 01 00 00 00 <f0> 0f b1 17 75 01 c3 89 c6 e8 2e 7a 9b ff 66 90 c3 90 90 90 90 90
> > [115147.050514] RSP: 0018:ffffb0f68822fed8 EFLAGS: 00010046
> > [115147.050515] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000000000
> > [115147.050516] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000000000002 RDI: 0000000000000000
> > [115147.050517] RBP: ffff9ca73af40a40 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000027340
> > [115147.050519] R10: ffffb0f68822fe70 R11: 00000000000000a9 R12: ffffb0f688067dc0
> > [115147.050520] R13: ffff9ca77e9a8000 R14: ffff9ca7634ca780 R15: ffff9ca7634ca780
> > [115147.050521] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff9ca77fb00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> > [115147.050523] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> > [115147.050524] CR2: 00000000000000b8 CR3: 000000004472e000 CR4: 00000000003406e0
> > [115147.050524] Call Trace:
> > [115147.050533] worker_thread+0xb4/0x3c0
> > [115147.050538] ? process_one_work+0x4a0/0x4a0
> > [115147.050540] kthread+0x152/0x170
> > [115147.050542] ? kthread_park+0xa0/0xa0
> > [115147.050544] ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40
> >
> > Further debugging shown that the worker thread was woken
> > before worker_attach_to_pool() finished in create_worker().
> >
> > Any kthread is supposed to stay in TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE sleep
> > until it is explicitly woken. But a spurious wakeup might
> > break this expectation.
> >
> > As a result, worker_thread() might read worker->pool before
> > it was set in worker create_worker() by worker_attach_to_pool().
> > Also manage_workers() might want to create yet another worker
> > before worker->pool->nr_workers is updated. It is a kind off
> > a chicken & egg problem.
> >
> > Synchronize these operations using a completion API.
> >
> > Note that worker->pool might be then read without wq_pool_attach_mutex.
> > Normal worker always belongs to the same pool.
> >
> > Also note that rescuer_thread() does not need this because all
> > needed values are set before the kthreads is created. It is
> > connected with a particular workqueue. It is attached to different
> > pools when needed.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
> > ---
> > kernel/workqueue.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
> > kernel/workqueue_internal.h | 1 +
> > 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
> > index 1ea50f6be843..9586b0797145 100644
> > --- a/kernel/workqueue.c
> > +++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
> > @@ -2378,10 +2380,19 @@ static void set_pf_worker(bool val)
> > static int worker_thread(void *__worker)
> > {
> > struct worker *worker = __worker;
> > - struct worker_pool *pool = worker->pool;
> > + struct worker_pool *pool;
> >
> > /* tell the scheduler that this is a workqueue worker */
> > set_pf_worker(true);
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Wait until the worker is ready to get started. It must be attached
> > + * to a pool first. This is needed because of spurious wakeups.
> > + */
> > + while (wait_for_completion_interruptible(&worker->ready_to_start))
>
> I have realized that this is wrong. I used _interruptible() variant
> because we do not know how long it would need to sleep. And long
> sleeping in TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE might trigger hung task warning.
>
> But kthread_bind_mask() requires that the kthread will be in
> TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE state.
>
> Note that even the freshly created kthread is sleeping in
> TASK_UNTERRUPTIBLE, see kthread() in kernel/kthread.c. But
> it does not trigger the hung task warning because there is
> a special check for this case, see check_hung_task():
>
> /*
> * When a freshly created task is scheduled once, changes its state to
> * TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE without having ever been switched out once, it
> * musn't be checked.
> */
> if (unlikely(!switch_count))
> return;
>
> The following seems to work well:
>
> while (!wait_for_completion_timeout(&worker->ready_to_start, 5 * HZ))
> ;

This is really ugly and I do not really see why this is needed. Should
there be such an overloaded system that create_worker cannot finish the
initialization before khungtask triggers then we should be notified. I
do not see how papering this over would be helpful.

That being said, I really thing that this should be plain
wait_for_completion()

With that changed, feel free to add
Reviewed-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>

and thanks helping to debug this and prepare the fix. I was not really
aware of the spurious wake up scenario. Btw. it would be great to
describe that in a more detail as well for future reference.

Thanks!
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-06-23 09:15    [W:0.151 / U:1.284 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site