lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Jun]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [net-next: PATCH 09/12] Documentation: ACPI: DSD: introduce DSA description
śr., 22 cze 2022 o 11:24 Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> napisał(a):
>
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 11:08:13AM +0200, Marcin Wojtas wrote:
> > wt., 21 cze 2022 o 13:42 Andy Shevchenko
> > <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> napisał(a):
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 01:18:38PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 02:09:14PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > > On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 09:47:31PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > >
> > > ...
> > >
> > > > > > > + Name (_CRS, ResourceTemplate ()
> > > > > > > + {
> > > > > > > + Memory32Fixed (ReadWrite,
> > > > > > > + 0xf212a200,
> > > > > > > + 0x00000010,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > What do these magic numbers mean?
> > > > >
> > > > > Address + Length, it's all described in the ACPI specification.
> > > >
> > > > The address+plus length of what? This device is on an MDIO bus. As
> > > > such, there is no memory! It probably makes sense to somebody who
> > > > knows ACPI, but to me i have no idea what it means.
> > >
> > > I see what you mean. Honestly I dunno what the device this description is for.
> > > For the DSA that's behind MDIO bus? Then it's definitely makes no sense and
> > > MDIOSerialBus() resources type is what would be good to have in ACPI
> > > specification.
> > >
> >
> > It's not device on MDIO bus, but the MDIO controller's register itself
>
> Ah. So this is equivalent to
>
> CP11X_LABEL(mdio): mdio@12a200 {
> #address-cells = <1>;
> #size-cells = <0>;
> compatible = "marvell,orion-mdio";
> reg = <0x12a200 0x10>;
> clocks = <&CP11X_LABEL(clk) 1 9>, <&CP11X_LABEL(clk) 1 5>,
> <&CP11X_LABEL(clk) 1 6>, <&CP11X_LABEL(clk) 1 18>;
> status = "disabled";
> };
>
> DT seems a lot more readable, "marvell,orion-mdio" is a good hint that
> device this is. But maybe it is more readable because that is what i'm
> used to.

No worries, this reaction is not uncommon (including myself), I agree
it becomes more readable, the longer you work with it :).

IMO the ACPI node of orion-mdio looks very similar. Please take a look:

Device (SMI0)
{
Name (_HID, "MRVL0100") // _HID: Hardware ID
Name (_UID, 0x00) // _UID: Unique ID
Method (_STA) // _STA: Device status
{
Return (0xF)
}
Name (_CRS, ResourceTemplate ()
{
Memory32Fixed (ReadWrite,
0xf212a200, // Address Base
0x00000010, // Address Length
)
})
}

You can "map" the objects/methods to what you know from DT farly easily:
_HID -> compatible string
_STA -> 'status' property
_CRS & Memory32Fixed -> 'reg' property (_CRS can also comprise IRQs
and other kind of resources, you can check [1] for more details).

Clocks are configured by firmware, so they are not referenced in the
tables and touched by the orion-mdio driver.

>
> Please could you add a lot more comments. Given that nobody currently
> actually does networking via ACPI, we have to assume everybody trying
> to use it is a newbie, and more comments are better than less.

I can add more verbose description of the example and probably a
reference to https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/firmware-guide/acpi/dsd/phy.rst
("DSDT entry for MDIO node").

[1] https://uefi.org/specs/ACPI/6.4/06_Device_Configuration/Device_Configuration.html#crs-current-resource-settings

Best regards,
Marcin

>
> Thanks
> Andrew

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-06-22 12:24    [W:0.152 / U:0.804 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site