lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Jun]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH RFC v2 03/18] scsi: core: Implement reserved command handling
On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 08:24:24AM +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> So my idea for SATA is simply _not_ to use reserved tags.
> Any TMF functions (or the equivalent thereof) should always be sent as
> non-NCQ commands. And when doing so we're back to QD=1 on SATA anyway, so
> there _must_ be tags available. Consequently the main reason for having
> reserved tags (namely to guarantee that tags are available for TMF) doesn't
> apply here.

At least in the non-elevator case (which includes all passthrough I/O)
request have tags assigned as soon as they are allocated. So, we
absolutely can have all tags allocated and then need to do a TMF.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-06-20 08:30    [W:0.121 / U:0.144 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site