Messages in this thread | | | From | Jaroslav Pulchart <> | Date | Sun, 19 Jun 2022 19:00:31 +0200 | Subject | Re: [Intel-wired-lan] ice: Error setting promisc mode on VSI 6 (rc=-17) @ 5.18.x |
| |
Hello,
yes, I revert that commit. Still the promiscs cannot be set and the dmesg error message changed to: --------------- $ ip link set em1 promisc on $ dmesg ... ice 0000:63:00.0 em1: Error setting Multicast promiscuous mode on VSI 6 ... ---------------
Jaroslav P.
ne 19. 6. 2022 v 13:51 odesílatel Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@leemhuis.info> napsal:
> > [TLDR: I'm adding this regression report to the list of tracked > regressions; all text from me you find below is based on a few templates > paragraphs you might have encountered already already in similar form.] > > Hi, this is your Linux kernel regression tracker. > > On 09.06.22 08:58, Jaroslav Pulchart wrote: > > > > I'm struggling with broken network connectivity at VMs using linux > > bridge at host after update of kernel from 5.17.x to 5.18.x @ Dell > > R750 server with E810-XXV NICs. > > > > I noticed the kernel reports "Error setting promisc mode" in dmesg. > > > > # dmesg | grep 'Error setting promisc' > > [ 24.863557] ice 0000:31:00.0: Error setting promisc mode on VSI 6 (rc=-17) > > [ 24.878369] ice 0000:31:00.0: Error setting promisc mode on VSI 6 (rc=-17) > > [ 25.045834] ice 0000:31:00.0: Error setting promisc mode on VSI 6 (rc=-17) > > [ 25.129840] ice 0000:b1:00.0: Error setting promisc mode on VSI 6 (rc=-17) > > [ 25.144440] ice 0000:b1:00.0: Error setting promisc mode on VSI 6 (rc=-17) > > > > # lspci -s 0000:31:00.0 > > 31:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation Ethernet Controller > > E810-XXV for SFP (rev 02) > > # lspci -s 0000:b1:00.0 > > b1:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation Ethernet Controller > > E810-XXV for SFP (rev 02) > > > > It is easy to reproduce by: > > # ip link set em1 promisc on > > # dmesg -T | tail -n 1 > > [Thu Jun 9 08:48:19 2022] ice 0000:31:00.0: Error setting promisc > > mode on VSI 6 (rc=-17) > > > > Could it be an 'ice' driver bug introduced in the 5.18 kernel? > > CCing the regression mailing list, as it should be in the loop for all > regressions, as explained here: > https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/admin-guide/reporting-issues.html > > Jaroslav, did you try to revert the change that was suggested to you in > https://lore.kernel.org/all/d993bbb6-e583-5d91-76c0-841cc5da86af@roeck-us.net/ > Did it help? > > Anyway: To be sure below issue doesn't fall through the cracks > unnoticed, I'm adding it to regzbot, my Linux kernel regression tracking > bot: > > #regzbot ^introduced v5.17 to v5.18 > #regzbot title net: ice: Error setting promisc mode on VSI 6 (rc=-17) @ > 5.18.x > #regzbot monitor > https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAK8fFZ68+xZ2Z0vDWnihF8PeJKEmEwCyyF-8W9PCZJTd8zfp-A@mail.gmail.com/ > #regzbot monitor > https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAK8fFZ61mQ3AYpdWjWtyUXzrs-RVMW61mBLrjRDXBxB-F9GzbA@mail.gmail.com/ > #regzbot ignore-activity > > This isn't a regression? This issue or a fix for it are already > discussed somewhere else? It was fixed already? You want to clarify when > the regression started to happen? Or point out I got the title or > something else totally wrong? Then just reply -- ideally with also > telling regzbot about it, as explained here: > https://linux-regtracking.leemhuis.info/tracked-regression/ > > Reminder for developers: When fixing the issue, add 'Link:' tags > pointing to the report (the mail this one replied to), as the kernel's > documentation call for; above page explains why this is important for > tracked regressions. > > Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat) > > P.S.: As the Linux kernel's regression tracker I deal with a lot of > reports and sometimes miss something important when writing mails like > this. If that's the case here, don't hesitate to tell me in a public > reply, it's in everyone's interest to set the public record straight.
| |