Messages in this thread | | | From | Doug Anderson <> | Date | Fri, 17 Jun 2022 12:56:52 -0700 | Subject | Re: [PATCH v6 1/6] FROMLIST: arm64: dts: qcom: sc7180-trogdor: Split out keyboard node and describe detachables |
| |
Hi,
On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 12:47 PM Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> wrote: > > Hi, > > On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 11:12 AM Joseph S. Barrera III > <joebar@chromium.org> wrote: > > > > From: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org> > > > > Trogdor devices that have a detachable keyboard still have a > > non-detachable keyboard input device present because we include the > > cros-ec-keyboard.dtsi snippet in the top-level sc7180-trogdor.dtsi file > > that every variant board includes. We do this because the > > keyboard-controller node also provides some buttons like the power > > button and volume buttons. Unfortunately, this means we register a > > keyboard input device that doesn't do anything on boards with a > > detachable keyboard. > > > > Change the node's compatible on detachables to the newly introduced > > "google,cros-ec-keyb-switches" compatible to indicate that there are > > only switches and no keyboard to register. Similarly, move the keyboard > > include that defines the keyboard-controller node out of > > sc7180-trogdor.dtsi to boards that actually have a keyboard so that the > > matrix properties are not defined on boards with the switches > > compatible. Future boards can either use the include approach or the > > node definition approach to describe a keyboard with possible switches > > or just some switches. > > > > Cc: Benson Leung <bleung@chromium.org> > > Cc: Guenter Roeck <groeck@chromium.org> > > Cc: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> > > Cc: Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@chromium.org> > > Cc: "Joseph S. Barrera III" <joebar@chromium.org> > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org> > > (am from https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220518172525.3319993-1-swboyd@chromium.org) > > > > evtest shows no more cros_ec device > > > > Cq-Depend: chromium:3609017 > > Tested-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org> > > Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> > > Signed-off-by: Joseph S. Barrera III <joebar@chromium.org> > > It's OK to re-post Stephen's patch with your series, but: > > 1. The subject shouldn't have FROMLIST. That's just for patches picked > back to a Chromium OS kernel. > > 2. You shouldn't have "(am from...)". Again, just for patches picked > back to a Chromium OS kernel. > > 3. No Cq-Depend. That's something for patches picked back to a > Chromium OS kernel. > > 4. You should remove tags that were added by the Chromium review > system, like Stephen's "Tested-by" and my "Reviewed-by". > > > Another alternative is to not post Stephen's patch but add a note that > your patch should be applied atop his, then point to his. AKA: > > https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220518172525.3319993-1-swboyd@chromium.org
A further note is that your series ought to be based on this one:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-msm/patch/20220602190621.1646679-1-swboyd@chromium.org/
...but when I apply your patch atop that one I get merge conflicts.
-Doug
| |