Re: [PATCH] locking/rwlocks: do not starve writers
On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 05:24:58PM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> If only tasklist_lock is problematic and needs the unfair variant, > then changing a few read_lock() for tasklist_lock will be less > invasive than ~1000 read_lock() elsewhere....
This is unknown. tasklist_lock was the obvious one, there might be more. Lockdep should be able to tell you.