lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Jun]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] sched: Drop outdated compile-optimization comment
Date
On 15/06/22 15:27, Brian Norris wrote:
> Looks like this exists from way back in 2011 (commit 095c0aa83e52
> ("sched: adjust scheduler cpu power for stolen time")), when there was a
> little more aggressive use of #if around these variables. That #if is
> gone, and the comment just confuses the reader now. (For one, we don't
> call sched_rt_avg_update() directly any more either.)
>

So that sched_rt_avg_update() became update_irq_load_avg() with

91c27493e78d ("sched/irq: Add IRQ utilization tracking")

and then the #ifdef configs were reorganized in

11d4afd4ff66 ("sched/pelt: Fix warning and clean up IRQ PELT config")

I'd argue that comment is still somewhat relevant but it applies to that
block:

#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_SCHED_AVG_IRQ
if ((irq_delta + steal) && sched_feat(NONTASK_CAPACITY))
update_irq_load_avg(rq, irq_delta + steal);
#endif

if !CONFIG_HAVE_SCHED_AVG_IRQ then yes you'd expect the compiler to not
even add a call to update_irq_load_avg() in there, but compilers aren't the
most trustworthy things :-) If you feel like it, you could play with
GCC/clang and see what they emit if you remove those #ifdefs.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-06-17 13:10    [W:0.508 / U:0.104 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site