lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Jun]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: possible trace_printk() bug in v5.19-rc1
On Thu, 16 Jun 2022 15:36:43 +0000
Chuck Lever III <chuck.lever@oracle.com> wrote:

> I haven't explicitly removed nfsd.ko, and lsmod says it's still there.
> And, trace_printk was working as expected on v5.18.

If you were to add a printk() with the same format in the same location,
does it work?

That is:

printk("%pS still here\n", __func__);

-- Steve

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-06-16 17:45    [W:0.123 / U:0.364 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site