Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Thu, 16 Jun 2022 07:27:58 -0600 | Subject | Re: [REGRESSION] connection timeout with routes to VRF | From | David Ahern <> |
| |
On 6/15/22 11:47 AM, Jan Luebbe wrote: > On Sat, 2022-06-11 at 10:44 -0600, David Ahern wrote: >> On 6/11/22 5:14 AM, Jan Luebbe wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> TL;DR: We think we have found a regression in the handling of VRF route >>> leaking >>> caused by "net: allow binding socket in a VRF when there's an unbound >>> socket" >>> (3c82a21f4320). >> >> This is the 3rd report in the past few months about this commit. >> >> ... > > Hmm, I've not been able to find other reports. Could you point me to them?
March of this year: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20220324171930.GA21272@EXT-6P2T573.localdomain/
Andy sent me an email offlist in May; same topic.
Hence you are the 3rd in 3 months.
...
>> >> Andy Roulin suggested the same fix to the same problem a few weeks back. >> Let's do it along with a test case in fcnl-test.sh which covers all of >> these vrf permutations. > > Thanks! I'd be happy to test any patch in our real setup.
as I said, Andy suggested the same fix as you. Feel free to submit as a patch; would be best to get test cases added to the fcnal-test script.
|  |