[lkml]   [2022]   [Jun]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [REGRESSION] connection timeout with routes to VRF
On 6/15/22 11:47 AM, Jan Luebbe wrote:
> On Sat, 2022-06-11 at 10:44 -0600, David Ahern wrote:
>> On 6/11/22 5:14 AM, Jan Luebbe wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> TL;DR: We think we have found a regression in the handling of VRF route
>>> leaking
>>> caused by "net: allow binding socket in a VRF when there's an unbound
>>> socket"
>>> (3c82a21f4320).
>> This is the 3rd report in the past few months about this commit.
>> ...
> Hmm, I've not been able to find other reports. Could you point me to them?

March of this year:

Andy sent me an email offlist in May; same topic.

Hence you are the 3rd in 3 months.


>> Andy Roulin suggested the same fix to the same problem a few weeks back.
>> Let's do it along with a test case in which covers all of
>> these vrf permutations.
> Thanks! I'd be happy to test any patch in our real setup.

as I said, Andy suggested the same fix as you. Feel free to submit as a
patch; would be best to get test cases added to the fcnal-test script.

 \ /
  Last update: 2022-06-16 15:29    [W:0.281 / U:1.464 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site