Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 16 Jun 2022 15:11:34 +0200 | From | "Jason A. Donenfeld" <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/11] 5.10.123-rc1 review |
| |
Hi Jon,
On Thu, Jun 16, 2022 at 09:48:37AM +0100, Jon Hunter wrote: > No new regressions for Tegra. I am seeing the following kernel warning > that is causing a boot test to fail, but this has been happening for a > few releases now (I would have reported it earlier but we have been > having some infrastructure issues) ... > > WARNING KERN urandom_read_iter: 82 callbacks suppressed > > This appears to be introduced by commit "random: convert to using > fops->read_iter()" [0]. Interestingly, I am not seeing this in the > mainline as far as I can tell and so I am not sure if there is something > else that is missing? > > > Test results for stable-v5.10: > 10 builds: 10 pass, 0 fail > 28 boots: 28 pass, 0 fail > 75 tests: 74 pass, 1 fail > > Linux version: 5.10.123-rc1-gf67ea0f67087 > Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000, > tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000, > tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180, > tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04 > > Test failures: tegra194-p2972-0000: boot.py > > Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com> > > Jon > > [0] > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220527084907.568432116@linuxfoundation.org/
Please CC me on RNG issues.
I'm surprised that this message results in a failure. It's not a WARN_ON() or a BUG() that's being triggered here. This is just the simple `pr_warn("%s: %d callbacks suppressed\n")` in lib/ratelimit.c, which really shouldn't be causing your CI to fail. Sounds like your harness could use some adjusting.
Nonetheless, you have found a 4 year old bug in the urandom warning accounting that was recently made more easily triggerable by a newer commit, though not the one you mentioned. I'll fix this up and keep you CC'd on the patch, which should make it into stable as well.
Jason
| |