lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Jun]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH v2 0/5] TUN/VirtioNet USO features support.
Hi, Jason
Apparently, your patch should work.
For now, I have an issue where segmentation between two guests on one
host still occurs.
Neither previous "hack" nor your patch helps.
Now I'm looking what the issue may be.
If you have some suggestions on where may I look, it would be helpful, thanks!

On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 3:18 PM Andrew Melnichenko <andrew@daynix.com> wrote:
>
> I'll check it, thank you!
>
> On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 9:56 AM Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 7:07 PM Andrew Melnichenko <andrew@daynix.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > The issue is that host segments packets between guests on the same host.
> > > Tests show that it happens because SKB_GSO_DODGY skb offload in
> > > virtio_net_hdr_from_skb().
> > > To do segmentation you need to remove SKB_GSO_DODGY or add SKB_GSO_PARTIAL
> > > The solution with DODGY/PARTIAL offload looks like a dirty hack, so
> > > for now, I've lived it as it is for further investigation.
> >
> > Ok, I managed to find the previous discussion. It looks to me the
> > reason is that __udp_gso_segment will segment dodgy packets
> > unconditionally.
> >
> > I wonder if the attached patch works? (compile test only).
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, May 17, 2022 at 9:32 AM Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 7:33 PM Andrew Melnychenko <andrew@daynix.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Added new offloads for TUN devices TUN_F_USO4 and TUN_F_USO6.
> > > > > Technically they enable NETIF_F_GSO_UDP_L4
> > > > > (and only if USO4 & USO6 are set simultaneously).
> > > > > It allows to transmission of large UDP packets.
> > > > >
> > > > > Different features USO4 and USO6 are required for qemu where Windows guests can
> > > > > enable disable USO receives for IPv4 and IPv6 separately.
> > > > > On the other side, Linux can't really differentiate USO4 and USO6, for now.
> > > > > For now, to enable USO for TUN it requires enabling USO4 and USO6 together.
> > > > > In the future, there would be a mechanism to control UDP_L4 GSO separately.
> > > > >
> > > > > Test it WIP Qemu https://github.com/daynix/qemu/tree/Dev_USOv2
> > > > >
> > > > > New types for VirtioNet already on mailing:
> > > > > https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/virtio-comment/202110/msg00010.html
> > > > >
> > > > > Also, there is a known issue with transmitting packages between two guests.
> > > >
> > > > Could you explain this more? It looks like a bug. (Or any pointer to
> > > > the discussion)
> > > >
> > > > Thanks
> > > >
> > > > > Without hacks with skb's GSO - packages are still segmented on the host's postrouting.
> > > > >
> > > > > Andrew (5):
> > > > > uapi/linux/if_tun.h: Added new offload types for USO4/6.
> > > > > driver/net/tun: Added features for USO.
> > > > > uapi/linux/virtio_net.h: Added USO types.
> > > > > linux/virtio_net.h: Support USO offload in vnet header.
> > > > > drivers/net/virtio_net.c: Added USO support.
> > > > >
> > > > > drivers/net/tap.c | 10 ++++++++--
> > > > > drivers/net/tun.c | 8 +++++++-
> > > > > drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 19 +++++++++++++++----
> > > > > include/linux/virtio_net.h | 9 +++++++++
> > > > > include/uapi/linux/if_tun.h | 2 ++
> > > > > include/uapi/linux/virtio_net.h | 4 ++++
> > > > > 6 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > 2.35.1
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-06-16 14:00    [W:0.059 / U:0.364 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site