lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Jun]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 2/5] iommu/mediatek: Add error path for loop of mm_dts_parse
From
On 2022-06-16 11:08, Yong Wu wrote:
> On Thu, 2022-06-16 at 09:59 +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
>> On 2022-06-16 06:42, Yong Wu wrote:
>>> The mtk_iommu_mm_dts_parse will parse the smi larbs nodes. if the
>>> i+1
>>> larb is parsed fail(return -EINVAL), we should of_node_put for the
>>> 0..i
>>> larbs. In the fail path, one of_node_put matches with
>>> of_parse_phandle in
>>> it.
>>>
>>> Fixes: d2e9a1102cfc ("iommu/mediatek: Contain MM IOMMU flow with
>>> the MM TYPE")
>>> Signed-off-by: Yong Wu <yong.wu@mediatek.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++-----
>>> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
>>> index 3b2489e8a6dd..ab24078938bf 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
>>> @@ -1071,12 +1071,12 @@ static int mtk_iommu_mm_dts_parse(struct
>>> device *dev, struct component_match **m
>>>
>>> plarbdev = of_find_device_by_node(larbnode);
>>> if (!plarbdev) {
>>> - of_node_put(larbnode);
>>> - return -ENODEV;
>>> + ret = -ENODEV;
>>> + goto err_larbnode_put;
>>> }
>>> if (!plarbdev->dev.driver) {
>>> - of_node_put(larbnode);
>>> - return -EPROBE_DEFER;
>>> + ret = -EPROBE_DEFER;
>>> + goto err_larbnode_put;
>>> }
>>> data->larb_imu[id].dev = &plarbdev->dev;
>>>
>>> @@ -1107,9 +1107,20 @@ static int mtk_iommu_mm_dts_parse(struct
>>> device *dev, struct component_match **m
>>> DL_FLAG_STATELESS | DL_FLAG_PM_RUNTIME);
>>> if (!link) {
>>> dev_err(dev, "Unable to link %s.\n", dev_name(data-
>>>> smicomm_dev));
>>> - return -EINVAL;
>>> + ret = -EINVAL;
>>> + goto err_larbnode_put;
>>> }
>>> return 0;
>>> +
>>> +err_larbnode_put:
>>> + while (i--) {
>>> + larbnode = of_parse_phandle(dev->of_node,
>>> "mediatek,larbs", i);
>>> + if (larbnode && of_device_is_available(larbnode)) {
>>> + of_node_put(larbnode);
>>> + of_node_put(larbnode);
>>> + }
>>
>> This looks a bit awkward - could we not just iterate through
>> data->larb_imu and put dev->of_node for each valid dev?
>
> It should work. Thanks very much.
>
>>
>> Also, of_find_device_by_node() takes a reference on the struct
>> device
>> itself, so strictly we should be doing put_device() on those as well
>> if we're bailing out.
>
> Thanks for this hint. A new reference for me. I will add it.

In fact, thinking about it some more we may as well do the of_node_put()
unconditionally immediately after the of_find_device_by_node() call, so
then it's *only* the device references we'd need to worry about cleaning
up in the failure path.

Robin.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-06-16 12:32    [W:0.246 / U:0.320 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site