lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Jun]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v5 1/1] mm/memory-failure: disable unpoison once hw error happens
Date
On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 10:00:05AM +0800, zhenwei pi wrote:
> Currently unpoison_memory(unsigned long pfn) is designed for soft
> poison(hwpoison-inject) only. Since 17fae1294ad9d, the KPTE gets
> cleared on a x86 platform once hardware memory corrupts.
>
> Unpoisoning a hardware corrupted page puts page back buddy only,
> the kernel has a chance to access the page with *NOT PRESENT* KPTE.
> This leads BUG during accessing on the corrupted KPTE.
>
> Suggested by David&Naoya, disable unpoison mechanism when a real HW error
> happens to avoid BUG like this:
...

>
> Fixes: 847ce401df392 ("HWPOISON: Add unpoisoning support")
> Fixes: 17fae1294ad9d ("x86/{mce,mm}: Unmap the entire page if the whole page is affected and poisoned")
> Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com>
> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: zhenwei pi <pizhenwei@bytedance.com>

Cc to stable?
I think that the current approach seems predictable to me than earlier versions,
so I can agree with sending this to stable a little more confidently.

> ---
> Documentation/vm/hwpoison.rst | 3 ++-
> drivers/base/memory.c | 2 +-
> include/linux/mm.h | 1 +
> mm/hwpoison-inject.c | 2 +-
> mm/madvise.c | 2 +-
> mm/memory-failure.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> 6 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>

...

> diff --git a/mm/memory-failure.c b/mm/memory-failure.c
> index b85661cbdc4a..385b5e99bfc1 100644
> --- a/mm/memory-failure.c
> +++ b/mm/memory-failure.c
> @@ -69,6 +69,8 @@ int sysctl_memory_failure_recovery __read_mostly = 1;
>
> atomic_long_t num_poisoned_pages __read_mostly = ATOMIC_LONG_INIT(0);
>
> +static bool hw_memory_failure;

Could you set the initial value explicitly? Using a default value is good,
but doing as the surrounding code do is better for consistency. And this
variable can be updated only once, so adding __read_mostly macro is also fine.

Thanks,
Naoya Horiguchi
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-06-15 10:16    [W:0.163 / U:0.264 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site