Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 15 Jun 2022 08:51:40 +0530 | Subject | Re: [PATCH V6 6/8] perf/tools: Extend branch type classification | From | Anshuman Khandual <> |
| |
On 6/14/22 22:23, German Gomez wrote: > Hi Anshuman, > > On 10/06/2022 04:50, Anshuman Khandual wrote: >> This updates the perf tool with generic branch type classification with new >> ABI extender place holder i.e PERF_BR_EXTEND_ABI, the new 4 bit branch type >> field i.e perf_branch_entry.new_type, new generic page fault related branch >> types and some arch specific branch types as added earlier in the kernel. >> >> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> >> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> >> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> >> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> >> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> >> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> >> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> >> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> >> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> >> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org >> Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org >> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> >> --- >> tools/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h | 16 ++++++++- >> tools/perf/builtin-script.c | 2 +- >> tools/perf/util/branch.c | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++- >> tools/perf/util/branch.h | 6 +++- >> tools/perf/util/session.c | 2 +- >> 5 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/tools/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h b/tools/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h >> index 26d8f0b5ac0d..d29280adc3c4 100644 >> --- a/tools/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h >> +++ b/tools/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h >> @@ -255,9 +255,22 @@ enum { >> PERF_BR_IRQ = 12, /* irq */ >> PERF_BR_SERROR = 13, /* system error */ >> PERF_BR_NO_TX = 14, /* not in transaction */ >> + PERF_BR_EXTEND_ABI = 15, /* extend ABI */ >> PERF_BR_MAX, >> }; >> >> +enum { >> + PERF_BR_NEW_FAULT_ALGN = 0, /* Alignment fault */ >> + PERF_BR_NEW_FAULT_DATA = 1, /* Data fault */ >> + PERF_BR_NEW_FAULT_INST = 2, /* Inst fault */ >> + PERF_BR_NEW_ARCH_1 = 3, /* Architecture specific */ >> + PERF_BR_NEW_ARCH_2 = 4, /* Architecture specific */ >> + PERF_BR_NEW_ARCH_3 = 5, /* Architecture specific */ >> + PERF_BR_NEW_ARCH_4 = 6, /* Architecture specific */ >> + PERF_BR_NEW_ARCH_5 = 7, /* Architecture specific */ >> + PERF_BR_NEW_MAX, >> +}; >> + >> #define PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_PLM_ALL \ >> (PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_USER|\ >> PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_KERNEL|\ >> @@ -1372,7 +1385,8 @@ struct perf_branch_entry { >> abort:1, /* transaction abort */ >> cycles:16, /* cycle count to last branch */ >> type:4, /* branch type */ >> - reserved:40; >> + new_type:4, /* additional branch type */ >> + reserved:36; >> }; >> >> union perf_sample_weight { >> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-script.c b/tools/perf/builtin-script.c >> index c689054002cc..d4d581230f23 100644 >> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-script.c >> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-script.c >> @@ -866,7 +866,7 @@ static int print_bstack_flags(FILE *fp, struct branch_entry *br) >> br->flags.in_tx ? 'X' : '-', >> br->flags.abort ? 'A' : '-', >> br->flags.cycles, >> - br->flags.type ? branch_type_name(br->flags.type) : "-"); >> + get_branch_type(br)); > (Small comment below regarding this line) > >> } >> >> static int perf_sample__fprintf_brstack(struct perf_sample *sample, >> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/branch.c b/tools/perf/util/branch.c >> index abc673347bee..6d962b0a4532 100644 >> --- a/tools/perf/util/branch.c >> +++ b/tools/perf/util/branch.c >> @@ -21,7 +21,10 @@ void branch_type_count(struct branch_type_stat *st, struct branch_flags *flags, >> if (flags->type == PERF_BR_UNKNOWN || from == 0) >> return; >> >> - st->counts[flags->type]++; >> + if (flags->type == PERF_BR_EXTEND_ABI) >> + st->new_counts[flags->new_type]++; >> + else >> + st->counts[flags->type]++; >> >> if (flags->type == PERF_BR_COND) { >> if (to > from) >> @@ -36,6 +39,25 @@ void branch_type_count(struct branch_type_stat *st, struct branch_flags *flags, >> st->cross_4k++; >> } >> >> +const char *branch_new_type_name(int new_type) >> +{ >> + const char *branch_new_names[PERF_BR_NEW_MAX] = { >> + "FAULT_ALGN", >> + "FAULT_DATA", >> + "FAULT_INST", >> + "ARCH_1", >> + "ARCH_2", >> + "ARCH_3", >> + "ARCH_4", >> + "ARCH_5" >> + }; >> + >> + if (new_type >= 0 && new_type < PERF_BR_NEW_MAX) >> + return branch_new_names[new_type]; >> + >> + return NULL; >> +} >> + >> const char *branch_type_name(int type) >> { >> const char *branch_names[PERF_BR_MAX] = { >> @@ -62,6 +84,17 @@ const char *branch_type_name(int type) >> return NULL; >> } >> >> +const char *get_branch_type(struct branch_entry *e) >> +{ >> + if (e->flags.type == PERF_BR_UNKNOWN) >> + return ""; > There is a small change of behavior in "perf script --field brstack". > Unknown branches were printed as "-" before but now it's an empty > string.
get_branch_type() replaces print output in two different functions. branch_stack__printf() used to print a space " " for PERF_BR_UNKNOWN, and print_bstack_flags() used to print a "-" for PERF_BR_UNKNOWN. When they are factorized via get_branch_type(), one of those print formats need to be choosen.
| |