lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Jun]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH 2/2] clk: mediatek: Add frequency hopping support
From
Il 12/06/22 15:54, Johnson Wang ha scritto:
> Add frequency hopping support and spread spectrum clocking
> control for MT8186.
>
> Signed-off-by: Edward-JW Yang <edward-jw.yang@mediatek.com>
> Signed-off-by: Johnson Wang <johnson.wang@mediatek.com>

Before going on with the review, there's one important consideration:
the Frequency Hopping control is related to PLLs only (so, no other clock
types get in the mix).

Checking the code, the *main* thing that we do here is initializing the
FHCTL by setting some registers, and we're performing the actual frequency
hopping operation in clk-pll, which is right but, at this point, I think
that the best way to proceed is to add the "FHCTL superpowers" to clk-pll
itself, instead of adding multiple new files and devicetree bindings that
are specific to the FHCTL itself.

This would mean that the `fh-id` and `perms` params that you're setting in
the devicetree get transferred to clk-mt8186 (and hardcoded there), as to
extend the PLL declarations to include these two: that will also simplify
the driver so that you won't have to match names here and there.

Just an example:

PLL(CLK_APMIXED_CCIPLL, "ccipll", 0x0224, 0x0230, 0,

PLL_AO, 0, 22, 0x0228, 24, 0, 0, 0, 0x0228, 2, FHCTL_PERM_DBG_DUMP),

Besides, there are another couple of reasons why you should do that instead,
of which:
- The devicetree should be "generic enough", we shall not see the direct value
to write to the registers in there (yet, perms assigns exactly that)
- These values won't change on a per-device basis, I believe? They're SoC-related,
not board-related, right?

In case they're board related (and/or related to TZ permissions), we can always add
a bool property to the apmixedsys to advertise that board X needs to use an
alternative permission (ex.: `mediatek,secure-fhctl`).

In any case, to speed up development (I believe that transferring this in clk-pll
means that the code will still be more or less the same), I've performed a review
on the code; check below.

> ---
> drivers/clk/mediatek/Kconfig | 8 +
> drivers/clk/mediatek/Makefile | 2 +
> drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-fhctl-ap.c | 347 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-fhctl-pll.c | 209 ++++++++++++++++
> drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-fhctl-pll.h | 74 ++++++
> drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-fhctl-util.h | 24 ++
> drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-fhctl.c | 191 ++++++++++++++
> drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-fhctl.h | 45 ++++
> drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-pll.c | 5 +-
> drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-pll.h | 5 +
> 10 files changed, 909 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> create mode 100644 drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-fhctl-ap.c
> create mode 100644 drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-fhctl-pll.c
> create mode 100644 drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-fhctl-pll.h
> create mode 100644 drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-fhctl-util.h
> create mode 100644 drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-fhctl.c
> create mode 100644 drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-fhctl.h
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/mediatek/Kconfig b/drivers/clk/mediatek/Kconfig
> index d5936cfb3bee..fd887c537a91 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/mediatek/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/clk/mediatek/Kconfig
> @@ -622,4 +622,12 @@ config COMMON_CLK_MT8516_AUDSYS
> help
> This driver supports MediaTek MT8516 audsys clocks.
>
> +config COMMON_CLK_MTK_FREQ_HOPPING
> + tristate "MediaTek frequency hopping driver"

If this goes inside of clk-pll, this configuration option can be safely removed.

> + depends on ARCH_MEDIATEK || COMPILE_TEST
> + select COMMON_CLK_MEDIATEK
> + help
> + This driver supports frequency hopping and spread spectrum clocking
> + control for some MediaTek SoCs.
> +
> endmenu
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/mediatek/Makefile b/drivers/clk/mediatek/Makefile
> index caf2ce93d666..3c0e9bd3978b 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/mediatek/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/clk/mediatek/Makefile
> @@ -99,3 +99,5 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_COMMON_CLK_MT8195) += clk-mt8195-apmixedsys.o clk-mt8195-topckgen.o
> clk-mt8195-apusys_pll.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_COMMON_CLK_MT8516) += clk-mt8516.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_COMMON_CLK_MT8516_AUDSYS) += clk-mt8516-aud.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_COMMON_CLK_MTK_FREQ_HOPPING) += fhctl.o
> +fhctl-objs += clk-fhctl.o clk-fhctl-ap.o clk-fhctl-pll.o
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-fhctl-ap.c b/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-fhctl-ap.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..9e3226a9c1ca
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-fhctl-ap.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,347 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/*
> + * Copyright (c) 2022 MediaTek Inc.
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/device.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/of_address.h>
> +#include <linux/of_device.h>
> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +#include <linux/string.h>
> +#include <linux/slab.h>
> +#include "clk-fhctl.h"
> +#include "clk-fhctl-pll.h"
> +#include "clk-fhctl-util.h"
> +
> +#define FHCTL_TARGET FHCTL_AP
> +
> +#define PERCENT_TO_DDSLMT(dds, percent_m10) \
> + ((((dds) * (percent_m10)) >> 5) / 100)
> +
> +struct fh_ap_match {
> + char *name;
> + struct fh_hdlr *hdlr;
> + int (*init)(struct pll_dts *array, struct fh_ap_match *match);
> +};
> +
> +struct hdlr_data {
> + struct pll_dts *array;
> + struct fh_pll_domain *domain;
> + spinlock_t *lock;
> +};
> +
> +static int fhctl_set_ssc_regs(struct fh_pll_regs *regs,
> + struct fh_pll_data *data,
> + int fh_id, int rate)
> +{
> + unsigned int updnlmt_val;
> +
> + if (rate > 0) {
> + fh_set_field(regs->reg_cfg, data->frddsx_en, 0);
> + fh_set_field(regs->reg_cfg, data->sfstrx_en, 0);
> + fh_set_field(regs->reg_cfg, data->fhctlx_en, 0);

Are all of these writes to be performed with a barrier?
Can't we use writel_relaxed() for some, with a "final" writel() where ordering
*really* matters?

Also, at least these three field settings are common between (rate > 0) and
(rate <= 0), so they can go outside of the conditional.

> +
> + /* Set the relative parameter registers (dt/df/upbnd/downbnd) */
> + fh_set_field(regs->reg_cfg, data->msk_frddsx_dys, data->df_val);
> + fh_set_field(regs->reg_cfg, data->msk_frddsx_dts, data->dt_val);
> +
> + writel((readl(regs->reg_con_pcw) & data->dds_mask) |
> + data->tgl_org, regs->reg_dds);
> +
> + /* Calculate UPDNLMT */
> + updnlmt_val = PERCENT_TO_DDSLMT((readl(regs->reg_dds) &
> + data->dds_mask), rate) <<
> + data->updnlmt_shft;
> +
> + writel(updnlmt_val, regs->reg_updnlmt);
> +
> + fh_set_field(regs->reg_hp_en, BIT(fh_id), 1);
> +
> + /* Enable SSC */
> + fh_set_field(regs->reg_cfg, data->frddsx_en, 1);
> + /* Enable Hopping control */
> + fh_set_field(regs->reg_cfg, data->fhctlx_en, 1);
> +
> + } else {
> + fh_set_field(regs->reg_cfg, data->frddsx_en, 0);
> + fh_set_field(regs->reg_cfg, data->sfstrx_en, 0);
> + fh_set_field(regs->reg_cfg, data->fhctlx_en, 0);
> +
> + /* Switch to APMIXEDSYS control */
> + fh_set_field(regs->reg_hp_en, BIT(fh_id), 0);
> +
> + /* Wait for DDS to be stable */
> + udelay(30);
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int hopping_hw_flow(void *priv_data, char *domain_name, int fh_id,
> + unsigned int new_dds, int postdiv)
> +{
> + struct fh_pll_domain *domain;
> + struct fh_pll_regs *regs;
> + struct fh_pll_data *data;
> + unsigned int dds_mask;
> + unsigned int mon_dds = 0;
> + int ret = 0;
> + unsigned int con_pcw_tmp;
> + struct hdlr_data *d = (struct hdlr_data *)priv_data;
> + struct pll_dts *array = d->array;
> +
> + domain = d->domain;
> + regs = &domain->regs[fh_id];
> + data = &domain->data[fh_id];
> + dds_mask = data->dds_mask;

Just perform these assignments in the variable declarations... with some
reordering as well, and drop the zero assignment to ret.

In few words:

struct hdlr_data *d = (struct hdlr_data *)priv_data;

struct fh_pll_domain *domain = d->domain;

struct fh_pll_regs *regs = &domain->regs[fh_id];

struct fh_pll_data *data = &domain->data[fh_id];

struct pll_dts *array = d->array;

u32 con_pcw_tmp, dds_mask;

u32 mon_dds = 0;

int ret;

This comment is valid for some other functions as well - I won't repeat
this for every instance... :-)

> +
> + if (array->ssc_rate)
> + fhctl_set_ssc_regs(regs, data, fh_id, 0);
> +
> + writel((readl(regs->reg_con_pcw) & dds_mask) |
> + data->tgl_org, regs->reg_dds);
> +
> + fh_set_field(regs->reg_cfg, data->sfstrx_en, 1);
> + fh_set_field(regs->reg_cfg, data->fhctlx_en, 1);
> + writel(data->slope0_value, regs->reg_slope0);
> + writel(data->slope1_value, regs->reg_slope1);
> +
> + fh_set_field(regs->reg_hp_en, BIT(fh_id), 1);
> + writel((new_dds) | (data->dvfs_tri), regs->reg_dvfs);
> +
> + /* Wait 1000 us until DDS stable */
> + ret = readl_poll_timeout_atomic(regs->reg_mon, mon_dds,
> + (mon_dds & dds_mask) == new_dds, 10, 1000);

Why are you writing to CON_PCW even when this returns en error?
Please add a comment explaining the reasons.

> +
> + con_pcw_tmp = readl(regs->reg_con_pcw) & (~dds_mask);
> + con_pcw_tmp = (con_pcw_tmp | (readl(regs->reg_mon) & dds_mask) |
> + data->pcwchg);
> +
> + writel(con_pcw_tmp, regs->reg_con_pcw);
> +
> + fh_set_field(regs->reg_hp_en, BIT(fh_id), 0);
> +
> + if (array->ssc_rate)
> + fhctl_set_ssc_regs(regs, data, fh_id, array->ssc_rate);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static unsigned int __get_postdiv(struct fh_pll_regs *regs,
> + struct fh_pll_data *data)
> +{
> + unsigned int regval;
> +
> + regval = (readl(regs->reg_con_postdiv) & data->postdiv_mask)
> + >> data->postdiv_offset;
> +
> + return data->postdiv_table[regval];

Can we instead simply reuse `struct clk_div_table` from clk-provider.h?

> +}
> +
> +static void __set_postdiv(struct fh_pll_regs *regs, struct fh_pll_data *data,
> + int postdiv)
> +{
> + unsigned int regval, temp;
> +
> + for (regval = 0 ; regval < data->postdiv_table_size ; regval++) {
> + if (data->postdiv_table[regval] > postdiv) {
> + regval--;
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + temp = (readl(regs->reg_con_postdiv)) & ~(data->postdiv_mask);
> + temp |= regval << data->postdiv_offset;
> + writel(temp, regs->reg_con_postdiv);
> +}
> +
> +static int fhctl_ap_hopping(void *priv_data, char *domain_name, int fh_id,
> + unsigned int new_dds, int postdiv)
> +{
> + struct fh_pll_domain *domain;
> + struct fh_pll_regs *regs;
> + struct fh_pll_data *data;
> + int ret = 0;
> + struct hdlr_data *d = (struct hdlr_data *)priv_data;
> + spinlock_t *lock = d->lock;
> + unsigned long flags = 0;
> + unsigned int pll_postdiv;
> +
> + domain = d->domain;
> + regs = &domain->regs[fh_id];
> + data = &domain->data[fh_id];
> +
> + if (postdiv > 0) {
> + pll_postdiv = __get_postdiv(regs, data);
> +
> + if (postdiv > pll_postdiv)
> + __set_postdiv(regs, data, postdiv);
> + }
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(lock, flags);
> +
> + ret = hopping_hw_flow(priv_data, domain_name, fh_id, new_dds, postdiv);
> +
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(lock, flags);
> +
> + if (postdiv > 0) {
> + if (postdiv < pll_postdiv)
> + __set_postdiv(regs, data, postdiv);
> + }
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int fhctl_ap_ssc_enable(void *priv_data, char *domain_name,
> + int fh_id, int rate)
> +{
> + struct fh_pll_domain *domain;
> + struct fh_pll_regs *regs;
> + struct fh_pll_data *data;
> + struct hdlr_data *d = (struct hdlr_data *)priv_data;
> + spinlock_t *lock = d->lock;
> + struct pll_dts *array = d->array;
> + unsigned long flags = 0;
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(lock, flags);
> +
> + domain = d->domain;
> + regs = &domain->regs[fh_id];
> + data = &domain->data[fh_id];
> +
> + fhctl_set_ssc_regs(regs, data, fh_id, rate);
> +
> + array->ssc_rate = rate;
> +
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(lock, flags);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int fhctl_ap_ssc_disable(void *priv_data, char *domain_name, int fh_id)
> +{
> + struct fh_pll_domain *domain;
> + struct fh_pll_regs *regs;
> + struct fh_pll_data *data;
> + struct hdlr_data *d = (struct hdlr_data *)priv_data;
> + spinlock_t *lock = d->lock;
> + struct pll_dts *array = d->array;
> + unsigned long flags = 0;
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(lock, flags);
> +
> + domain = d->domain;
> + regs = &domain->regs[fh_id];
> + data = &domain->data[fh_id];
> +
> + fhctl_set_ssc_regs(regs, data, fh_id, 0);
> +
> + array->ssc_rate = 0;
> +
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(lock, flags);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}


Just commonize these two...

static int __fhctl_ap_ssc_enable(struct hdlr_data *d, int fh_id, int rate)
{
struct fh_pll_domain *domain = d->domain;

struct fh_pll_regs *regs = &domain->regs[fh_id];

struct fh_pll_data *data = &domain->data[fh_id];

struct pll_dts *array = d->array;

spinlock_t *lock = d->lock;

unsigned long flags = 0;



spin_lock_irqsave(lock, flags);



fhctl_set_ssc_regs(regs, data, fh_id, rate);



array->ssc_rate = rate;



spin_unlock_irqrestore(lock, flags);



return 0;
}

static int fhctl_ap_ssc_enable(void *priv_data, char *domain_name, int fh_id, int rate)
{
return __fhctl_ap_ssc_enable((struct hdlr_data *)priv_data, domain_name,
fh_id, rate);
}

static int fhctl_ap_ssc_disable(void *priv_data, char *domain_name, int fh_id)
{
return __fhctl_ap_ssc_enable((struct hdlr_data *)priv_data, domain_name,
fh_id, 0);
}


> +
> +static int fhctl_ap_hw_init(struct pll_dts *array, struct fh_ap_match *match)
> +{
> + static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(lock);
> + struct hdlr_data *priv_data;
> + struct fh_hdlr *hdlr;
> + struct fh_pll_domain *domain;
> + int fh_id = array->fh_id;
> + struct fh_pll_regs *regs;
> + struct fh_pll_data *data;
> + int mask = BIT(fh_id);
> +
> + priv_data = kzalloc(sizeof(*priv_data), GFP_KERNEL);
> + hdlr = kzalloc(sizeof(*hdlr), GFP_KERNEL);
> + init_fh_domain(array->domain, array->comp, array->fhctl_base,
> + array->apmixed_base);
> +
> + priv_data->array = array;
> + priv_data->lock = &lock;
> + priv_data->domain = get_fh_domain(array->domain);
> +
> + /* do HW init */
> + domain = priv_data->domain;
> + regs = &domain->regs[fh_id];
> + data = &domain->data[fh_id];
> +
> + fh_set_field(regs->reg_clk_con, mask, 1);
> + fh_set_field(regs->reg_rst_con, mask, 0);
> + fh_set_field(regs->reg_rst_con, mask, 1);
> + writel(0x0, regs->reg_cfg);
> + writel(0x0, regs->reg_updnlmt);
> + writel(0x0, regs->reg_dds);
> +
> + /* hook to array */
> + hdlr->data = priv_data;
> + hdlr->ops = match->hdlr->ops;
> + /* hook hdlr to array is the last step */
> + mb();

I really don't think that you need this barrier here - if there's something that
I have misunderstood about that, please provide an extensive explanation.

> + array->hdlr = hdlr;
> +
> + /* do SSC */
> + if (array->ssc_rate) {
> + struct fh_hdlr *hdlr = array->hdlr;
> +
> + hdlr->ops->ssc_enable(hdlr->data, array->domain, array->fh_id,
> + array->ssc_rate);
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static struct fh_operation fhctl_ap_ops = {
> + .hopping = fhctl_ap_hopping,
> + .ssc_enable = fhctl_ap_ssc_enable,
> + .ssc_disable = fhctl_ap_ssc_disable,
> +};
> +
> +static struct fh_hdlr mt8186_hdlr = {
> + .ops = &fhctl_ap_ops,
> +};
> +
> +static struct fh_ap_match mt8186_match = {
> + .name = "mediatek,mt8186-fhctl",
> + .hdlr = &mt8186_hdlr,
> + .init = &fhctl_ap_hw_init,
> +};
> +
> +static struct fh_ap_match *matches[] = {
> + &mt8186_match,
> + NULL,
> +};
> +
> +int fhctl_ap_init(struct pll_dts *array)
> +{
> + int i;
> + int num_pll = array->num_pll;
> + struct fh_ap_match **match = matches;
> +
> + /* find match by compatible */
> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(matches); i++) {
> + char *comp = (*match)->name;
> + char *target = array->comp;
> +
> + if (!strcmp(comp, target))
> + break;
> + match++;
> + }
> +
> + if (*match == NULL)
> + return -1;
> +
> + /* init flow for every pll */
> + for (i = 0; i < num_pll; i++, array++) {
> + char *method = array->method;
> +
> + if (!strcmp(method, FHCTL_TARGET))
> + (*match)->init(array, *match);
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-fhctl-pll.c b/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-fhctl-pll.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..b3ccbbd04e1b
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-fhctl-pll.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,209 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/*
> + * Copyright (c) 2022 MediaTek Inc.
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/device.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include "clk-fhctl-pll.h"
> +#include "clk-fhctl-util.h"
> +
> +#define REG_ADDR(base, x) ((void __iomem *)((unsigned long)base + (x)))
> +
> +struct fh_pll_match {
> + char *compatible;
> + struct fh_pll_domain **domain_list;
> +};
> +
> +static int fhctl_pll_init(struct fh_pll_domain *d, void __iomem *fhctl_base,
> + void __iomem *apmixed_base)
> +{
> + struct fh_pll_data *data = d->data;
> + struct fh_pll_offset *offset = d->offset;
> + struct fh_pll_regs *regs = d->regs;
> +
> + if (regs->reg_hp_en)
> + return 0;
> +
> + while (data->dds_mask != 0) {
> + int regs_offset;
> +
> + /* fhctl common part */
> + regs->reg_hp_en = REG_ADDR(fhctl_base, offset->offset_hp_en);
> + regs->reg_clk_con = REG_ADDR(fhctl_base,
> + offset->offset_clk_con);
> + regs->reg_rst_con = REG_ADDR(fhctl_base,
> + offset->offset_rst_con);
> + regs->reg_slope0 = REG_ADDR(fhctl_base, offset->offset_slope0);
> + regs->reg_slope1 = REG_ADDR(fhctl_base, offset->offset_slope1);
> +
> + /* fhctl pll part */
> + regs_offset = offset->offset_fhctl + offset->offset_cfg;
> + regs->reg_cfg = REG_ADDR(fhctl_base, regs_offset);
> + regs->reg_updnlmt = REG_ADDR(regs->reg_cfg,
> + offset->offset_updnlmt);
> + regs->reg_dds = REG_ADDR(regs->reg_cfg, offset->offset_dds);
> + regs->reg_dvfs = REG_ADDR(regs->reg_cfg, offset->offset_dvfs);
> + regs->reg_mon = REG_ADDR(regs->reg_cfg, offset->offset_mon);
> +
> + /* apmixed part */
> + regs->reg_con_pcw = REG_ADDR(apmixed_base,
> + offset->offset_con_pcw);
> + regs->reg_con_postdiv = REG_ADDR(apmixed_base,
> + offset->offset_con_postdiv);
> +
> + data++;
> + offset++;
> + regs++;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static unsigned int __postdiv_pow_tbl[8] = {1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 1, 1, 1};
> +#define POSTDIV_TABLE_SIZE (sizeof(__postdiv_pow_tbl)\
> + /sizeof(unsigned int))
> +
> +#define SIZE_8186_TOP (sizeof(mt8186_top_data)\
> + /sizeof(struct fh_pll_data))
> +#define DATA_8186_TOP(_name) { \
Is it just only about the name?
I mean, are there other SoCs for which each PLL needs different parameters?

If not, there are many ways to commonize these params instead of repeating
them over and over again...

> + .name = _name, \
> + .dds_mask = GENMASK(21, 0), \
> + .postdiv_mask = GENMASK(26, 24), \
> + .postdiv_offset = 24, \
> + .postdiv_table = __postdiv_pow_tbl, \
> + .postdiv_table_size = POSTDIV_TABLE_SIZE, \
> + .slope0_value = 0x6003c97, \
> + .slope1_value = 0x6003c97, \
> + .sfstrx_en = BIT(2), \
> + .frddsx_en = BIT(1), \
> + .fhctlx_en = BIT(0), \
> + .tgl_org = BIT(31), \
> + .dvfs_tri = BIT(31), \
> + .pcwchg = BIT(31), \
> + .dt_val = 0x0, \
> + .df_val = 0x9, \
> + .updnlmt_shft = 16, \
> + .msk_frddsx_dys = GENMASK(23, 20), \
> + .msk_frddsx_dts = GENMASK(19, 16), \
> + }
> +#define OFFSET_8186_TOP(_fhctl, _con_pcw) { \
> + .offset_fhctl = _fhctl, \
> + .offset_con_pcw = _con_pcw, \
> + .offset_con_postdiv = _con_pcw, \
> + .offset_hp_en = 0x0, \
> + .offset_clk_con = 0x8, \
> + .offset_rst_con = 0xc, \
> + .offset_slope0 = 0x10, \
> + .offset_slope1 = 0x14, \
> + .offset_cfg = 0x0, \
> + .offset_updnlmt = 0x4, \
> + .offset_dds = 0x8, \
> + .offset_dvfs = 0xc, \
> + .offset_mon = 0x10, \
> + }
> +static struct fh_pll_data mt8186_top_data[] = {
> + DATA_8186_TOP("armpll_ll"),
> + DATA_8186_TOP("armpll_bl"),
> + DATA_8186_TOP("ccipll"),
> + DATA_8186_TOP("mainpll"),
> + DATA_8186_TOP("mmpll"),
> + DATA_8186_TOP("tvdpll"),
> + DATA_8186_TOP("mpll"),
> + DATA_8186_TOP("adsppll"),
> + DATA_8186_TOP("mfgpll"),
> + DATA_8186_TOP("nnapll"),
> + DATA_8186_TOP("nna2pll"),
> + DATA_8186_TOP("msdcpll"),
> + DATA_8186_TOP("mempll"),
> + {}
> +};
> +static struct fh_pll_offset mt8186_top_offset[] = {
> + OFFSET_8186_TOP(0x003C, 0x0208),
> + OFFSET_8186_TOP(0x0050, 0x0218),
> + OFFSET_8186_TOP(0x0064, 0x0228),
> + OFFSET_8186_TOP(0x0078, 0x0248),
> + OFFSET_8186_TOP(0x008C, 0x0258),
> + OFFSET_8186_TOP(0x00A0, 0x0268),
> + OFFSET_8186_TOP(0x00B4, 0x0278),
> + OFFSET_8186_TOP(0x00C8, 0x0308),
> + OFFSET_8186_TOP(0x00DC, 0x0318),
> + OFFSET_8186_TOP(0x00F0, 0x0360),
> + OFFSET_8186_TOP(0x0104, 0x0370),
> + OFFSET_8186_TOP(0x0118, 0x0390),
> + OFFSET_8186_TOP(0x012c, 0xdeb1),
> + {}
> +};
> +static struct fh_pll_regs mt8186_top_regs[SIZE_8186_TOP];
> +static struct fh_pll_domain mt8186_top = {
> + .name = "top",
> + .data = (struct fh_pll_data *)&mt8186_top_data,
> + .offset = (struct fh_pll_offset *)&mt8186_top_offset,
> + .regs = (struct fh_pll_regs *)&mt8186_top_regs,
> + .init = &fhctl_pll_init,
> +};
> +static struct fh_pll_domain *mt8186_domain[] = {
> + &mt8186_top,
> + NULL,
> +};
> +static struct fh_pll_match mt8186_match = {
> + .compatible = "mediatek,mt8186-fhctl",
> + .domain_list = (struct fh_pll_domain **)mt8186_domain,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct fh_pll_match *matches[] = {
> + &mt8186_match,
> + NULL
> +};
> +
> +
> +static struct fh_pll_domain **get_list(char *comp)
> +{
> + struct fh_pll_match **match;
> + static struct fh_pll_domain **list;
> + int i;
> +
> + match = (struct fh_pll_match **)matches;
> +
> + /* name used only if !list */
> + if (!list) {
> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(matches); i++) {
> + if (!strcmp(comp, (*match)->compatible)) {
> + list = (*match)->domain_list;
> + break;
> + }
> + match++;
> + }
> + }
> + return list;
> +}
> +void init_fh_domain(const char *domain, char *comp, void __iomem *fhctl_base,
> + void __iomem *apmixed_base)
> +{
> + struct fh_pll_domain **list;
> +
> + list = get_list(comp);
> +
> + while (*list != NULL) {
> + if (!strcmp(domain, (*list)->name)) {
> + (*list)->init(*list, fhctl_base, apmixed_base);
> + return;
> + }
> + list++;
> + }
> +}
> +
> +struct fh_pll_domain *get_fh_domain(const char *domain)
> +{
> + struct fh_pll_domain **list;
> +
> + list = get_list(NULL);
> +
> + /* find instance */
> + while (*list != NULL) {
> + if (!strcmp(domain, (*list)->name))
> + return *list;
> + list++;
> + }
> + return NULL;
> +}
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-fhctl-pll.h b/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-fhctl-pll.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..7f0f7577f7a5
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-fhctl-pll.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> +/*
> + * Copyright (c) 2022 MediaTek Inc.
> + */
> +
> +#ifndef __CLK_FHCTL_PLL_H
> +#define __CLK_FHCTL_PLL_H
> +#include <linux/types.h>
> +#include <linux/bitops.h>
> +#include <linux/iopoll.h>
> +
> +struct fh_pll_data {
> + char *name;
> + unsigned int dds_mask;
> + unsigned int postdiv_mask;
> + unsigned int postdiv_offset;
> + unsigned int *postdiv_table;
> + unsigned int postdiv_table_size;
> + unsigned int slope0_value;
> + unsigned int slope1_value;
> + unsigned int sfstrx_en;
> + unsigned int frddsx_en;
> + unsigned int fhctlx_en;
> + unsigned int tgl_org;
> + unsigned int dvfs_tri;
> + unsigned int pcwchg;
> + unsigned int dt_val;
> + unsigned int df_val;
> + unsigned int updnlmt_shft;
> + unsigned int msk_frddsx_dys;
> + unsigned int msk_frddsx_dts;

That's describing some hardware, so... you should really use `u32` here
as that would be more descriptive.

> +};
> +struct fh_pll_offset {
> + int offset_fhctl;
> + int offset_con_pcw;
> + int offset_con_postdiv;
> + int offset_hp_en;
> + int offset_clk_con;
> + int offset_rst_con;
> + int offset_slope0;
> + int offset_slope1;
> + int offset_cfg;
> + int offset_updnlmt;
> + int offset_dds;
> + int offset_dvfs;
> + int offset_mon;

These also seem to be describing HW registers, and I don't think that
we'll ever see a negative offset for any of these?

> +};
> +struct fh_pll_regs {
> + void __iomem *reg_hp_en;
> + void __iomem *reg_clk_con;
> + void __iomem *reg_rst_con;
> + void __iomem *reg_slope0;
> + void __iomem *reg_slope1;
> + void __iomem *reg_cfg;
> + void __iomem *reg_updnlmt;
> + void __iomem *reg_dds;
> + void __iomem *reg_dvfs;
> + void __iomem *reg_mon;
> + void __iomem *reg_con_pcw;
> + void __iomem *reg_con_postdiv;
> +};
> +struct fh_pll_domain {
> + char *name;
> + struct fh_pll_data *data;
> + struct fh_pll_offset *offset;
> + struct fh_pll_regs *regs;
> + int (*init)(struct fh_pll_domain *d, void __iomem *fhctl_base,
> + void __iomem *apmixed_base);
> +};
> +extern struct fh_pll_domain *get_fh_domain(const char *name);
> +extern void init_fh_domain(const char *domain_name, char *comp_name,
> + void __iomem *fhctl_base,
> + void __iomem *apmixed_base);
> +#endif

...and I think this covers enough of the code that may be transferred to clk-pll.

Excited to see the next iteration of this one!

Cheers,
Angelo

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-06-13 11:45    [W:0.174 / U:1.180 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site