Messages in this thread | | | From | "Alim Akhtar" <> | Subject | RE: [mkp-scsi:for-next 31/41] drivers/phy/samsung/phy-fsd-ufs.c:50:3: error: field designator 'cfgs' does not refer to any field in type 'const struct samsung_ufs_phy_drvdata'; did you mean 'cfg'? | Date | Tue, 14 Jun 2022 07:23:27 +0530 |
| |
Hi Martin
>-----Original Message----- >From: Martin K. Petersen [mailto:martin.petersen@oracle.com] >Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2022 7:15 AM >To: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com> >Cc: 'kernel test robot' <lkp@intel.com>; llvm@lists.linux.dev; kbuild- >all@lists.01.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; 'Martin K. Petersen' ><martin.petersen@oracle.com>; 'Chanho Park' ><chanho61.park@samsung.com>; 'Bharat Uppal' ><bharat.uppal@samsung.com> >Subject: Re: [mkp-scsi:for-next 31/41] drivers/phy/samsung/phy-fsd- >ufs.c:50:3: error: field designator 'cfgs' does not refer to any field in type >'const struct samsung_ufs_phy_drvdata'; did you mean 'cfg'? > > >Alim, > >> I was expecting phy driver changes will go via phy tree, where [1] is >> available. >> >> @Martin, can you please take a look? >> >> You can just take the ufs changes (along with its device tree) and >> drop the phy change or take the [1] above. > >Doesn't matter to me, happy to drop the series again. I just queued it up to >see if there would be any warnings. > No need to drop entire series, as UFS changes has got all Reviewed-by tags.
Just drop patch-{1/6, 2/6 and 3/6} (phy changes)
And please keep patch-{4/6, 5/6 and 6/6} in your tree
Thanks
>-- >Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
| |