Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 13 Jun 2022 20:14:55 -0500 | From | Tyler Hicks <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 00/06] fid refcounting improvements and fixes |
| |
On 2022-06-14 06:00:21, Dominique Martinet wrote: > Tyler Hicks wrote on Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 03:20:53PM -0500: > > On 2022-06-12 17:53:23, Dominique Martinet wrote: > > > @@ -222,7 +221,8 @@ static struct p9_fid *v9fs_fid_lookup_with_uid(struct dentry *dentry, > > > * We need to hold rename lock when doing a multipath > > > * walk to ensure none of the patch component change > > > */ > > > - fid = p9_client_walk(old_fid, l, &wnames[i], clone); > > > + fid = p9_client_walk(old_fid, l, &wnames[i], > > > + old_fid == root_fid /* clone */); > > > > This is no problem at all. The rebased patches look good to me. Squash > > your fix to my fix and it should be ready to go. > > Thanks for all your reviews :) > I've rebased my branch if you want to check: > https://github.com/martinetd/linux/commits/9p-next
I've diffed the individual patches from before and after the rebase. It all looks great to me.
> We've just started a cycle so I'll submit the first three patches (fixes > to stable) next week, and the rest for when 5.20 cycle starts.
That sounds like the right plan to me.
> Feel free to remind me if it looks like I forgot.
Will do!
Tyler
> -- > Dominique >
| |