Messages in this thread |  | | From | Heiko Stübner <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] riscv: dts: sifive: "fix" pmic watchdog node name | Date | Mon, 13 Jun 2022 16:05:12 +0200 |
| |
Am Montag, 13. Juni 2022, 15:33:49 CEST schrieb Conor.Dooley@microchip.com: > > On 06/06/2022 21:13, Conor Dooley wrote: > > From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> > > > > After converting the pmic watchdog binding to yaml, dtbs_check complains > > that the node name doesn't match the binding. "Fix" it. > > Hey Palmer, > The three dt-binding changes were accepted - do I need to poke SiFive to > ack the dts change or are you fine just taking it?
I don't think a node-name has relevance to vendor decisions ;-) .
Looking at bindings/watchdog/watchdog.yaml we clearly see that the node name is always watchdog or watchdog@foo, so this change is clearly correct.
Reviewed-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
> Thanks, > Conor. > > > > > Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> > > Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> > > --- > > arch/riscv/boot/dts/sifive/hifive-unmatched-a00.dts | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/sifive/hifive-unmatched-a00.dts b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/sifive/hifive-unmatched-a00.dts > > index c4ed9efdff03..1f386b07a832 100644 > > --- a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/sifive/hifive-unmatched-a00.dts > > +++ b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/sifive/hifive-unmatched-a00.dts > > @@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ rtc { > > compatible = "dlg,da9063-rtc"; > > }; > > > > - wdt { > > + watchdog { > > compatible = "dlg,da9063-watchdog"; > > }; > > > _______________________________________________ > linux-riscv mailing list > linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv >
|  |