lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Jun]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/2] char: lp: ensure that index has not exceeded LP_NO
From
On 10/06/22 6:58 pm, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 03, 2022 at 06:30:39PM +0530, Shreenidhi Shedi wrote:
>> From: Shreenidhi Shedi <sshedi@vmware.com>
>>
>> After finishing the loop, index value can be equal to LP_NO and lp_table
>> array is of size LP_NO, so this can end up in accessing an out of bound
>> address in lp_register function.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Shreenidhi Shedi <sshedi@vmware.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/char/lp.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/char/lp.c b/drivers/char/lp.c
>> index 0e22e3b0a..d474d02b6 100644
>> --- a/drivers/char/lp.c
>> +++ b/drivers/char/lp.c
>> @@ -972,7 +972,7 @@ static void lp_attach(struct parport *port)
>> if (port_num[i] == -1)
>> break;
>>
>> - if (!lp_register(i, port))
>> + if (i < LP_NO && !lp_register(i, port))
>> lp_count++;
>
> How can this ever be needed? Look at the check further up for the check
> of lp_count which prevents this from every going too large.
>
> So how can an address be accessed out of bound here?
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

Thanks for the review. Assume lp_count is less than LP_NO now and we enter the for loop
and for some reason for loop exits after i reaching the value LP_NO and right after that
we call lp_register() with i and I can be equal to LP_NO.

--
Shedi

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-06-10 15:42    [W:0.138 / U:0.036 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site