lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Jun]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH] clk: qcom: clk-rpmh: Fix if statement to match comment
From
Date
Quoting Li Zhengyu (2022-05-31 02:45:39)
> (c->state) is u32, (enable) is bool. It returns false when
> (c->state) > 1 and (enable) is true. Convert (c->state) to bool.
>
> Signed-off-by: Li Zhengyu <lizhengyu3@huawei.com>

Nice catch! It looks like it fixes an optimization, where we don't want
to run through and check has_state_changed() if this clk is already
enabled or disabled. But how does this ever happen? The clk framework
already reference counts prepare/unprepare, so how can we get into this
function when the condition would be true, after this patch?

I think we can simply remove the if condition entirely. Do you agree?

> ---
> drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c
> index aed907982344..851e127432a9 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c
> @@ -196,7 +196,7 @@ static int clk_rpmh_aggregate_state_send_command(struct clk_rpmh *c,
> int ret;
>
> /* Nothing required to be done if already off or on */
> - if (enable == c->state)
> + if (enable == !!c->state)
> return 0;
>
> c->state = enable ? c->valid_state_mask : 0;

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-06-10 22:00    [W:0.039 / U:0.712 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site