Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 7 May 2022 21:57:13 +0100 | From | Phillip Potter <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 3/3] block: remove last remaining traces of IDE documentation |
| |
On Fri, May 06, 2022 at 04:24:34PM -0400, Paul Gortmaker wrote: > [Re: [PATCH 3/3] block: remove last remaining traces of IDE documentation] On 06/05/2022 (Fri 18:54) Phillip Potter wrote: > > > On Fri, May 06, 2022 at 11:32:41AM -0400, Paul Gortmaker wrote: > > [...] > > > > Are you working off linux-next? If not, what is your baseline and what > > > are you running and what do you see? For example, the commands below: > > > > > > The ecb86 that I sent in this e-mail still applies on linux-next of > > > today which contains Jens next as you can see: > > > > > > > I was yes, the point I was trying to make (poorly) is that your patch > > conflicts with Randy's patch which itself is not yet in linux-next, as > > normally I send everything together at the start of the merge window to > > Jens, as I don't have my own kernel.org tree yet, and usually I only get > > one or two patches in a cycle anyway. > > > > This is not your fault, you couldn't have been expected to know this in > > retrospect, and I should probably look into getting my own tree/GPG key > > sorted to alleviate this problem in future. > > > > In the meantime, if you're comfortable with the idea, I can just resolve > > the conflict myself when I send the patches onto Jens this time and > > include patch 3/3 pre-fixed up. Merge window will be fairly soon anyway. > > Sure, go ahead - just fix up things so all the last bits are gone; don't > even worry about patch attribution; I don't care about that. > > Paul. > -- > > > > > Thanks, > > Phil
Hi Paul,
Thanks, I want to make sure you are properly attributed though, as I appreciate the effort you've gone to.
All the best, Phil
| |