lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [May]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH v4 1/4] KVM: s390: selftests: Use TAP interface in the memop test
Date
The memop test currently does not have any output (unless one of the
TEST_ASSERT statement fails), so it's hard to say for a user whether
a certain new sub-test has been included in the binary or not. Let's
make this a little bit more user-friendly and include some TAP output
via the kselftests.h interface.

Reviewed-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/memop.c | 95 ++++++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 77 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/memop.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/memop.c
index 49f26f544127..e704c6fa5758 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/memop.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/memop.c
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@

#include "test_util.h"
#include "kvm_util.h"
+#include "kselftest.h"

enum mop_target {
LOGICAL,
@@ -691,34 +692,92 @@ static void test_errors(void)
kvm_vm_free(t.kvm_vm);
}

+struct testdef {
+ const char *name;
+ void (*test)(void);
+ int extension;
+} testlist[] = {
+ {
+ .name = "simple copy",
+ .test = test_copy,
+ },
+ {
+ .name = "generic error checks",
+ .test = test_errors,
+ },
+ {
+ .name = "copy with storage keys",
+ .test = test_copy_key,
+ .extension = 1,
+ },
+ {
+ .name = "copy with key storage protection override",
+ .test = test_copy_key_storage_prot_override,
+ .extension = 1,
+ },
+ {
+ .name = "copy with key fetch protection",
+ .test = test_copy_key_fetch_prot,
+ .extension = 1,
+ },
+ {
+ .name = "copy with key fetch protection override",
+ .test = test_copy_key_fetch_prot_override,
+ .extension = 1,
+ },
+ {
+ .name = "error checks with key",
+ .test = test_errors_key,
+ .extension = 1,
+ },
+ {
+ .name = "termination",
+ .test = test_termination,
+ .extension = 1,
+ },
+ {
+ .name = "error checks with key storage protection override",
+ .test = test_errors_key_storage_prot_override,
+ .extension = 1,
+ },
+ {
+ .name = "error checks without key fetch prot override",
+ .test = test_errors_key_fetch_prot_override_not_enabled,
+ .extension = 1,
+ },
+ {
+ .name = "error checks with key fetch prot override",
+ .test = test_errors_key_fetch_prot_override_enabled,
+ .extension = 1,
+ },
+};
+
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
- int memop_cap, extension_cap;
+ int memop_cap, extension_cap, idx;

setbuf(stdout, NULL); /* Tell stdout not to buffer its content */

+ ksft_print_header();
+
memop_cap = kvm_check_cap(KVM_CAP_S390_MEM_OP);
extension_cap = kvm_check_cap(KVM_CAP_S390_MEM_OP_EXTENSION);
if (!memop_cap) {
- print_skip("CAP_S390_MEM_OP not supported");
- exit(KSFT_SKIP);
+ ksft_exit_skip("CAP_S390_MEM_OP not supported.\n");
}

- test_copy();
- if (extension_cap > 0) {
- test_copy_key();
- test_copy_key_storage_prot_override();
- test_copy_key_fetch_prot();
- test_copy_key_fetch_prot_override();
- test_errors_key();
- test_termination();
- test_errors_key_storage_prot_override();
- test_errors_key_fetch_prot_override_not_enabled();
- test_errors_key_fetch_prot_override_enabled();
- } else {
- print_skip("storage key memop extension not supported");
+ ksft_set_plan(ARRAY_SIZE(testlist));
+
+ for (idx = 0; idx < ARRAY_SIZE(testlist); idx++) {
+ if (testlist[idx].extension >= extension_cap) {
+ testlist[idx].test();
+ ksft_test_result_pass("%s\n", testlist[idx].name);
+ } else {
+ ksft_test_result_skip("%s - extension level %d not supported\n",
+ testlist[idx].name,
+ testlist[idx].extension);
+ }
}
- test_errors();

- return 0;
+ ksft_finished(); /* Print results and exit() accordingly */
}
--
2.31.1
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-05-31 12:17    [W:0.318 / U:0.128 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site