lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [May]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/2] net/ncsi: use proper "mellanox" DT vendor prefix
From
On 31/05/2022 10:21, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Sun, 2022-05-29 at 13:10 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> "mlx" Devicetree vendor prefix is not documented and instead "mellanox"
>> should be used.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
>> ---
>> net/ncsi/ncsi-manage.c | 3 ++-
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/ncsi/ncsi-manage.c b/net/ncsi/ncsi-manage.c
>> index 78814417d753..80713febfac6 100644
>> --- a/net/ncsi/ncsi-manage.c
>> +++ b/net/ncsi/ncsi-manage.c
>> @@ -1803,7 +1803,8 @@ struct ncsi_dev *ncsi_register_dev(struct net_device *dev,
>> pdev = to_platform_device(dev->dev.parent);
>> if (pdev) {
>> np = pdev->dev.of_node;
>> - if (np && of_get_property(np, "mlx,multi-host", NULL))
>> + if (np && (of_get_property(np, "mellanox,multi-host", NULL) ||
>> + of_get_property(np, "mlx,multi-host", NULL)))
>> ndp->mlx_multi_host = true;
>> }
>>
>
> I can't guess which tree are you targeting, devicetree? net-next? could
> you please specify?

Both independently. The patch here for net-next (although it is closed
now). The DTS patch can come later via ARM SoC maintainer tree.


Best regards,
Krzysztof

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-05-31 11:07    [W:0.621 / U:0.048 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site