Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | Chengming Zhou <> | Subject | [PATCH v4] sched/fair: optimize and simplify rq leaf_cfs_rq_list | Date | Wed, 1 Jun 2022 10:18:48 +0800 |
| |
We notice the rq leaf_cfs_rq_list has two problems when do bugfix backports and some test profiling.
1. cfs_rqs under throttled subtree could be added to the list, and make their fully decayed ancestors on the list, even though not needed.
2. #1 also make the leaf_cfs_rq_list management complex and error prone, this is the list of related bugfix so far:
commit 31bc6aeaab1d ("sched/fair: Optimize update_blocked_averages()") commit fe61468b2cbc ("sched/fair: Fix enqueue_task_fair warning") commit b34cb07dde7c ("sched/fair: Fix enqueue_task_fair() warning some more") commit 39f23ce07b93 ("sched/fair: Fix unthrottle_cfs_rq() for leaf_cfs_rq list") commit 0258bdfaff5b ("sched/fair: Fix unfairness caused by missing load decay") commit a7b359fc6a37 ("sched/fair: Correctly insert cfs_rq's to list on unthrottle") commit fdaba61ef8a2 ("sched/fair: Ensure that the CFS parent is added after unthrottling") commit 2630cde26711 ("sched/fair: Add ancestors of unthrottled undecayed cfs_rq")
commit 31bc6aeaab1d ("sched/fair: Optimize update_blocked_averages()") delete every cfs_rq under throttled subtree from rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list, and delete the throttled_hierarchy() test in update_blocked_averages(), which optimized update_blocked_averages().
But those later bugfix add cfs_rqs under throttled subtree back to rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list again, with their fully decayed ancestors, for the integrity of rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list.
This patch takes another method, skip all cfs_rqs under throttled hierarchy when list_add_leaf_cfs_rq(), to completely make cfs_rqs under throttled subtree off the leaf_cfs_rq_list.
So we don't need to consider throttled related things in enqueue_entity(), unthrottle_cfs_rq() and enqueue_task_fair(), which simplify the code a lot. Also optimize update_blocked_averages() since cfs_rqs under throttled hierarchy and their ancestors won't be on the leaf_cfs_rq_list.
Signed-off-by: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com> --- v4: - make sure the attach/detach is propagated down up to the throttled cfs_rq. Thanks Vincent.
v3: - fix !CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED build error, reported by kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
v2: - move throttled_hierarchy() outside list_add_leaf_cfs_rq(), suggested by Vincent. --- kernel/sched/fair.c | 92 ++++++++++++++------------------------------- 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c index 77b2048a9326..b3371fa40548 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c @@ -3144,6 +3144,8 @@ void reweight_task(struct task_struct *p, int prio) load->inv_weight = sched_prio_to_wmult[prio]; } +static inline int throttled_hierarchy(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq); + #ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED #ifdef CONFIG_SMP /* @@ -3254,8 +3256,6 @@ static long calc_group_shares(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq) } #endif /* CONFIG_SMP */ -static inline int throttled_hierarchy(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq); - /* * Recomputes the group entity based on the current state of its group * runqueue. @@ -4368,16 +4368,11 @@ enqueue_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se, int flags) __enqueue_entity(cfs_rq, se); se->on_rq = 1; - /* - * When bandwidth control is enabled, cfs might have been removed - * because of a parent been throttled but cfs->nr_running > 1. Try to - * add it unconditionally. - */ - if (cfs_rq->nr_running == 1 || cfs_bandwidth_used()) - list_add_leaf_cfs_rq(cfs_rq); - - if (cfs_rq->nr_running == 1) + if (cfs_rq->nr_running == 1) { check_enqueue_throttle(cfs_rq); + if (!throttled_hierarchy(cfs_rq)) + list_add_leaf_cfs_rq(cfs_rq); + } } static void __clear_buddies_last(struct sched_entity *se) @@ -4992,11 +4987,18 @@ void unthrottle_cfs_rq(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq) /* update hierarchical throttle state */ walk_tg_tree_from(cfs_rq->tg, tg_nop, tg_unthrottle_up, (void *)rq); - /* Nothing to run but something to decay (on_list)? Complete the branch */ if (!cfs_rq->load.weight) { - if (cfs_rq->on_list) - goto unthrottle_throttle; - return; + if (!cfs_rq->on_list) + return; + /* + * Nothing to run but something to decay (on_list)? + * Complete the branch. + */ + for_each_sched_entity(se) { + if (list_add_leaf_cfs_rq(cfs_rq_of(se))) + break; + } + goto unthrottle_throttle; } task_delta = cfs_rq->h_nr_running; @@ -5034,31 +5036,12 @@ void unthrottle_cfs_rq(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq) /* end evaluation on encountering a throttled cfs_rq */ if (cfs_rq_throttled(qcfs_rq)) goto unthrottle_throttle; - - /* - * One parent has been throttled and cfs_rq removed from the - * list. Add it back to not break the leaf list. - */ - if (throttled_hierarchy(qcfs_rq)) - list_add_leaf_cfs_rq(qcfs_rq); } /* At this point se is NULL and we are at root level*/ add_nr_running(rq, task_delta); unthrottle_throttle: - /* - * The cfs_rq_throttled() breaks in the above iteration can result in - * incomplete leaf list maintenance, resulting in triggering the - * assertion below. - */ - for_each_sched_entity(se) { - struct cfs_rq *qcfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se); - - if (list_add_leaf_cfs_rq(qcfs_rq)) - break; - } - assert_list_leaf_cfs_rq(rq); /* Determine whether we need to wake up potentially idle CPU: */ @@ -5713,13 +5696,6 @@ enqueue_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags) /* end evaluation on encountering a throttled cfs_rq */ if (cfs_rq_throttled(cfs_rq)) goto enqueue_throttle; - - /* - * One parent has been throttled and cfs_rq removed from the - * list. Add it back to not break the leaf list. - */ - if (throttled_hierarchy(cfs_rq)) - list_add_leaf_cfs_rq(cfs_rq); } /* At this point se is NULL and we are at root level*/ @@ -5743,21 +5719,6 @@ enqueue_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags) update_overutilized_status(rq); enqueue_throttle: - if (cfs_bandwidth_used()) { - /* - * When bandwidth control is enabled; the cfs_rq_throttled() - * breaks in the above iteration can result in incomplete - * leaf list maintenance, resulting in triggering the assertion - * below. - */ - for_each_sched_entity(se) { - cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se); - - if (list_add_leaf_cfs_rq(cfs_rq)) - break; - } - } - assert_list_leaf_cfs_rq(rq); hrtick_update(rq); @@ -11287,9 +11248,13 @@ static inline bool vruntime_normalized(struct task_struct *p) */ static void propagate_entity_cfs_rq(struct sched_entity *se) { - struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq; + struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se); + + if (cfs_rq_throttled(cfs_rq)) + return; - list_add_leaf_cfs_rq(cfs_rq_of(se)); + if (!throttled_hierarchy(cfs_rq)) + list_add_leaf_cfs_rq(cfs_rq); /* Start to propagate at parent */ se = se->parent; @@ -11297,14 +11262,13 @@ static void propagate_entity_cfs_rq(struct sched_entity *se) for_each_sched_entity(se) { cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se); - if (!cfs_rq_throttled(cfs_rq)){ - update_load_avg(cfs_rq, se, UPDATE_TG); - list_add_leaf_cfs_rq(cfs_rq); - continue; - } + update_load_avg(cfs_rq, se, UPDATE_TG); - if (list_add_leaf_cfs_rq(cfs_rq)) + if (cfs_rq_throttled(cfs_rq)) break; + + if (!throttled_hierarchy(cfs_rq)) + list_add_leaf_cfs_rq(cfs_rq); } } #else -- 2.36.1
| |