lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [May]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 12/17] md/raid5-cache: Move struct r5l_log definition to raid5-log.h


On 2022-05-29 23:59, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 10:35:59AM -0600, Logan Gunthorpe wrote:
>> Move struct r5l_log definition to raid5-log.h. While this reduces
>> encapsulation, it is necessary for the definition of r5l_log to be
>> public so that rcu_access_pointer() can be used on conf-log in the
>> next patch.
>>
>> rcu_access_pointer(p) doesn't technically dereference the log pointer
>> however, it does use typeof(*p) and some older GCC versions (anything
>> earlier than gcc-10) will wrongly try to dereference the structure:
>>
>> include/linux/rcupdate.h:384:9: error: dereferencing pointer to
>> incomplete type ‘struct r5l_log’
>>
>> typeof(*p) *local = (typeof(*p) *__force)READ_ONCE(p); \
>> ^
>>
>> include/linux/rcupdate.h:495:31: note: in expansion of
>> macro ‘__rcu_access_pointer’
>>
>> #define rcu_access_pointer(p) __rcu_access_pointer((p),
>> __UNIQUE_ID(rcu), __rcu)
>>
>> To prevent this, simply provide the definition where
>> rcu_access_pointer() may be used.
>
> What about just moving any code that does the rcu_access_pointer on
> conf->log to raid5-cache.c and doing an out of line call for it
> instead?

I guess we could do that. All the inline functions in raid5-log.h are
there to choose between the r5l or the ppl implementaiton. So it that
would mean the r5l implementation would probably be inlined and ppl
would be doing a second out of line call. Not sure if that matters, but
it seems a little odd.

Logan

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-05-30 17:59    [W:0.077 / U:1.992 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site