Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Wed, 25 May 2022 14:49:28 +0200 | From | Maxime Ripard <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v10 01/21] dt-bindings: mediatek,dpi: Add DPINTF compatible |
| |
Hi,
On Mon, May 23, 2022 at 12:47:34PM +0200, Guillaume Ranquet wrote: > From: Markus Schneider-Pargmann <msp@baylibre.com> > > DPINTF is similar to DPI but does not have the exact same feature set > or register layouts. > > DPINTF is the sink of the display pipeline that is connected to the > DisplayPort controller and encoder unit. It takes the same clocks as > DPI. > > Signed-off-by: Markus Schneider-Pargmann <msp@baylibre.com> > Signed-off-by: Guillaume Ranquet <granquet@baylibre.com> > --- > .../bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,dpi.yaml | 13 ++++++++----- > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,dpi.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,dpi.yaml > index dd2896a40ff0..6d9f6c11806e 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,dpi.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,dpi.yaml > @@ -4,16 +4,16 @@ > $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/display/mediatek/mediatek,dpi.yaml# > $schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml# > > -title: mediatek DPI Controller Device Tree Bindings > +title: mediatek DPI/DPINTF Controller > > maintainers: > - CK Hu <ck.hu@mediatek.com> > - Jitao shi <jitao.shi@mediatek.com> > > description: | > - The Mediatek DPI function block is a sink of the display subsystem and > - provides 8-bit RGB/YUV444 or 8/10/10-bit YUV422 pixel data on a parallel > - output bus. > + The Mediatek DPI and DPINTF function blocks are a sink of the display > + subsystem and provides 8-bit RGB/YUV444 or 8/10/10-bit YUV422 pixel data on a > + parallel output bus. > > properties: > compatible: > @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ properties: > - mediatek,mt8173-dpi > - mediatek,mt8183-dpi > - mediatek,mt8192-dpi > + - mediatek,mt8195-dpintf
Weren't you supposed to change it to have a separator between dp and intf?
If it's no longer in your plans, the second patch should have s/dp_intf/dpintf/
Maxime [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] |  |