lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [May]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 5.17 114/158] mptcp: strict local address ID selection
On Mon, May 23, 2022 at 08:51:52PM -0700, Mat Martineau wrote:
> On Mon, 23 May 2022, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>
> > From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
> >
> > [ Upstream commit 4cf86ae84c718333928fd2d43168a1e359a28329 ]
> >
> > The address ID selection for MPJ subflows created in response
> > to incoming ADD_ADDR option is currently unreliable: it happens
> > at MPJ socket creation time, when the local address could be
> > unknown.
> >
> > Additionally, if the no local endpoint is available for the local
> > address, a new dummy endpoint is created, confusing the user-land.
> >
> > This change refactor the code to move the address ID selection inside
> > the rebuild_header() helper, when the local address eventually
> > selected by the route lookup is finally known. If the address used
> > is not mapped by any endpoint - and thus can't be advertised/removed
> > pick the id 0 instead of allocate a new endpoint.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
> > ---
> > net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c | 13 --------
> > net/mptcp/protocol.c | 3 ++
> > net/mptcp/protocol.h | 3 +-
> > net/mptcp/subflow.c | 67 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> > 4 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
> >
>
> Greg, Sasha -
>
> Is it possible to drop this one patch? It makes one of the mptcp selftests
> fail (mptcp_join.sh, "single address, backup").

Does that mean the backport is incorrect, or that the selftest is wrong?

> Looks like this patch has been included in stable because of this single
> hunk that helps "mptcp: Do TCP fallback on early DSS checksum failure" apply
> cleanly:
>
> > diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.h b/net/mptcp/protocol.h
> > index aec767ee047a..e4413b3e50c2 100644
> > --- a/net/mptcp/protocol.h
> > +++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.h
> > @@ -442,7 +442,8 @@ struct mptcp_subflow_context {
> > rx_eof : 1,
> > can_ack : 1, /* only after processing the remote a key */
> > disposable : 1, /* ctx can be free at ulp release time */
> > - stale : 1; /* unable to snd/rcv data, do not use for xmit */
> > + stale : 1, /* unable to snd/rcv data, do not use for xmit */
> > + local_id_valid : 1; /* local_id is correctly initialized */
> > enum mptcp_data_avail data_avail;
> > u32 remote_nonce;
> > u64 thmac;
>
> "mptcp: Do TCP fallback on early DSS checksum failure" also adds a bit to
> that bitfield, but there is no functional dependency between the patches.
>
> If you need to drop the "mptcp: Do TCP fallback..." patch too, I can send a
> backported version tomorrow that accounts for that bitfield change.

Yes, I had to drop that second patch because of this. Both are now
dropped from 5.15 and 5.17, can you provide a working backport?

thanks,

greg k-h

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-05-25 09:52    [W:0.473 / U:0.236 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site