Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | Michael Walle <> | Subject | [PATCH net] net: lan966x: check devm_of_phy_get() for -EDEFER_PROBE | Date | Thu, 26 May 2022 01:12:39 +0200 |
| |
At the moment, if devm_of_phy_get() returns an error the serdes simply isn't set. While it is bad to ignore an error in general, there is a particular bug that network isn't working if the serdes driver is compiled as a module. In that case, devm_of_phy_get() returns -EDEFER_PROBE and the error is silently ignored.
The serdes is optional, it is not there if the port is using RGMII, in which case devm_of_phy_get() returns -ENODEV. Rearrange the error handling so that -ENODEV will be handled but other error codes will abort the probing.
Fixes: d28d6d2e37d1 ("net: lan966x: add port module support") Signed-off-by: Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc> --- drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_main.c | 9 +++++++-- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_main.c index 6ad68b422129..5784c4161e5e 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_main.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_main.c @@ -1120,8 +1120,13 @@ static int lan966x_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) lan966x->ports[p]->fwnode = fwnode_handle_get(portnp); serdes = devm_of_phy_get(lan966x->dev, to_of_node(portnp), NULL); - if (!IS_ERR(serdes)) - lan966x->ports[p]->serdes = serdes; + if (PTR_ERR(serdes) == -ENODEV) + serdes = NULL; + if (IS_ERR(serdes)) { + err = PTR_ERR(serdes); + goto cleanup_ports; + } + lan966x->ports[p]->serdes = serdes; lan966x_port_init(lan966x->ports[p]); } -- 2.30.2
| |