Messages in this thread | | | From | Vincent Guittot <> | Date | Mon, 23 May 2022 18:23:09 +0200 | Subject | Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: optimize and simplify rq leaf_cfs_rq_list |
| |
On Wed, 27 Apr 2022 at 18:07, Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com> wrote: > > We notice the rq leaf_cfs_rq_list has two problems when do bugfix > backports and some test profiling. > > 1. cfs_rqs under throttled subtree could be added to the list, and > make their fully decayed ancestors on the list, even though not needed. > > 2. #1 also make the leaf_cfs_rq_list management complex and error prone, > this is the list of related bugfix so far: > > commit 31bc6aeaab1d ("sched/fair: Optimize update_blocked_averages()") > commit fe61468b2cbc ("sched/fair: Fix enqueue_task_fair warning") > commit b34cb07dde7c ("sched/fair: Fix enqueue_task_fair() warning some more") > commit 39f23ce07b93 ("sched/fair: Fix unthrottle_cfs_rq() for leaf_cfs_rq list") > commit 0258bdfaff5b ("sched/fair: Fix unfairness caused by missing load decay") > commit a7b359fc6a37 ("sched/fair: Correctly insert cfs_rq's to list on unthrottle") > commit fdaba61ef8a2 ("sched/fair: Ensure that the CFS parent is added after unthrottling") > commit 2630cde26711 ("sched/fair: Add ancestors of unthrottled undecayed cfs_rq") > > commit 31bc6aeaab1d ("sched/fair: Optimize update_blocked_averages()") > delete every cfs_rq under throttled subtree from rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list, > and delete the throttled_hierarchy() test in update_blocked_averages(), > which optimized update_blocked_averages(). > > But those later bugfix add cfs_rqs under throttled subtree back to > rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list again, with their fully decayed ancestors, for > the integrity of rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list. > > This patch takes another method, skip all cfs_rqs under throttled > hierarchy when list_add_leaf_cfs_rq(), to completely make cfs_rqs > under throttled subtree off the leaf_cfs_rq_list. > > So we don't need to consider throttled related things in > enqueue_entity(), unthrottle_cfs_rq() and enqueue_task_fair(), > which simplify the code a lot. Also optimize update_blocked_averages() > since cfs_rqs under throttled hierarchy and their ancestors > won't be on the leaf_cfs_rq_list. > > Signed-off-by: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com> > --- > kernel/sched/fair.c | 72 ++++++++++----------------------------------- > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 56 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c > index 1ad18b5cc1b8..083c3d32c899 100644 > --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c > +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c > @@ -309,6 +309,8 @@ const struct sched_class fair_sched_class; > > #ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED > > +static inline int throttled_hierarchy(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq); > + > /* Walk up scheduling entities hierarchy */ > #define for_each_sched_entity(se) \ > for (; se; se = se->parent) > @@ -331,7 +333,7 @@ static inline bool list_add_leaf_cfs_rq(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq) > struct rq *rq = rq_of(cfs_rq); > int cpu = cpu_of(rq); > > - if (cfs_rq->on_list) > + if (cfs_rq->on_list || throttled_hierarchy(cfs_rq))
Please move throttled_hierarchy() outside list_add_leaf_cfs_rq() because the task will not be added in this case which is quite misleading
I will continue to check the various corner cases but I haven't seen problem so far with your method
> return rq->tmp_alone_branch == &rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list; > > cfs_rq->on_list = 1; > @@ -3242,8 +3244,6 @@ static long calc_group_shares(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq) > } > #endif /* CONFIG_SMP */ > > -static inline int throttled_hierarchy(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq); > - > /* > * Recomputes the group entity based on the current state of its group > * runqueue. > @@ -4356,16 +4356,10 @@ enqueue_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se, int flags) > __enqueue_entity(cfs_rq, se); > se->on_rq = 1; > > - /* > - * When bandwidth control is enabled, cfs might have been removed > - * because of a parent been throttled but cfs->nr_running > 1. Try to > - * add it unconditionally. > - */ > - if (cfs_rq->nr_running == 1 || cfs_bandwidth_used()) > + if (cfs_rq->nr_running == 1) { > list_add_leaf_cfs_rq(cfs_rq); > - > - if (cfs_rq->nr_running == 1) > check_enqueue_throttle(cfs_rq); > + } > } > > static void __clear_buddies_last(struct sched_entity *se) > @@ -4980,11 +4974,18 @@ void unthrottle_cfs_rq(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq) > /* update hierarchical throttle state */ > walk_tg_tree_from(cfs_rq->tg, tg_nop, tg_unthrottle_up, (void *)rq); > > - /* Nothing to run but something to decay (on_list)? Complete the branch */ > if (!cfs_rq->load.weight) { > - if (cfs_rq->on_list) > - goto unthrottle_throttle; > - return; > + if (!cfs_rq->on_list) > + return; > + /* > + * Nothing to run but something to decay (on_list)? > + * Complete the branch. > + */ > + for_each_sched_entity(se) { > + if (list_add_leaf_cfs_rq(cfs_rq_of(se))) > + break; > + } > + goto unthrottle_throttle; > } > > task_delta = cfs_rq->h_nr_running; > @@ -5022,31 +5023,12 @@ void unthrottle_cfs_rq(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq) > /* end evaluation on encountering a throttled cfs_rq */ > if (cfs_rq_throttled(qcfs_rq)) > goto unthrottle_throttle; > - > - /* > - * One parent has been throttled and cfs_rq removed from the > - * list. Add it back to not break the leaf list. > - */ > - if (throttled_hierarchy(qcfs_rq)) > - list_add_leaf_cfs_rq(qcfs_rq); > } > > /* At this point se is NULL and we are at root level*/ > add_nr_running(rq, task_delta); > > unthrottle_throttle: > - /* > - * The cfs_rq_throttled() breaks in the above iteration can result in > - * incomplete leaf list maintenance, resulting in triggering the > - * assertion below. > - */ > - for_each_sched_entity(se) { > - struct cfs_rq *qcfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se); > - > - if (list_add_leaf_cfs_rq(qcfs_rq)) > - break; > - } > - > assert_list_leaf_cfs_rq(rq); > > /* Determine whether we need to wake up potentially idle CPU: */ > @@ -5701,13 +5683,6 @@ enqueue_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags) > /* end evaluation on encountering a throttled cfs_rq */ > if (cfs_rq_throttled(cfs_rq)) > goto enqueue_throttle; > - > - /* > - * One parent has been throttled and cfs_rq removed from the > - * list. Add it back to not break the leaf list. > - */ > - if (throttled_hierarchy(cfs_rq)) > - list_add_leaf_cfs_rq(cfs_rq); > } > > /* At this point se is NULL and we are at root level*/ > @@ -5731,21 +5706,6 @@ enqueue_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags) > update_overutilized_status(rq); > > enqueue_throttle: > - if (cfs_bandwidth_used()) { > - /* > - * When bandwidth control is enabled; the cfs_rq_throttled() > - * breaks in the above iteration can result in incomplete > - * leaf list maintenance, resulting in triggering the assertion > - * below. > - */ > - for_each_sched_entity(se) { > - cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se); > - > - if (list_add_leaf_cfs_rq(cfs_rq)) > - break; > - } > - } > - > assert_list_leaf_cfs_rq(rq); > > hrtick_update(rq); > -- > 2.35.2 >
| |