Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | Willy Tarreau <> | Subject | [PATCH v3 net 2/7] tcp: use different parts of the port_offset for index and offset | Date | Mon, 2 May 2022 10:46:09 +0200 |
| |
Amit Klein suggests that we use different parts of port_offset for the table's index and the port offset so that there is no direct relation between them.
Cc: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com> Cc: Moshe Kol <moshe.kol@mail.huji.ac.il> Cc: Yossi Gilad <yossi.gilad@mail.huji.ac.il> Cc: Amit Klein <aksecurity@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> --- net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c b/net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c index 9d24d9319f3d..29c701cd8312 100644 --- a/net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c +++ b/net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c @@ -777,7 +777,7 @@ int __inet_hash_connect(struct inet_timewait_death_row *death_row, net_get_random_once(table_perturb, sizeof(table_perturb)); index = hash_32(port_offset, INET_TABLE_PERTURB_SHIFT); - offset = READ_ONCE(table_perturb[index]) + port_offset; + offset = READ_ONCE(table_perturb[index]) + (port_offset >> 32); offset %= remaining; /* In first pass we try ports of @low parity. -- 2.17.5
| |