lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [May]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH 00/20] perf vendors events arm64: Multiple Arm CPUs
From

On 18/05/2022 09:15, John Garry wrote:
> On 17/05/2022 15:32, Robin Murphy wrote:
>>
>> On 2022-05-10 11:47, Nick Forrington wrote:
>>> Add Performance Monitoring Unit event data for the Arm CPUs listed
>>> below.
>>>
>>> Changesets are dependent due to incremental updates to the common
>>> events
>>> file and mapfile.csv.
>>>
>>> Data is sourced from https://github.com/ARM-software/data
>>>
>>> Nick Forrington (20):
>>>    perf vendors events arm64: Arm Cortex-A5
>>>    perf vendors events arm64: Arm Cortex-A7
>>>    perf vendors events arm64: Arm Cortex-A8
>>>    perf vendors events arm64: Arm Cortex-A9
>>>    perf vendors events arm64: Arm Cortex-A15
>>>    perf vendors events arm64: Arm Cortex-A17
>>>    perf vendors events arm64: Arm Cortex-A32
>>
>> Obligatory question over anything relating to the above CPUs being in
>> an "arch/arm64" directory... ;)
>
> If we were to add to arm32/arm then the common event numbers and maybe
> other JSONs in future would need to be duplicated.
>
> Would there be any reason to add to arm32/arm apart to from being
> strictly proper? Maybe if lots of other 32b support for other vendors
> came along then it could make sense (to separate them out).

Not that I'm aware of, although I don't have these available to test.

I'm happy to re-submit without these CPUs if it simplifies things.

Thanks,
Nick

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-05-19 15:46    [W:0.121 / U:1.208 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site