lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [May]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v15 07/14] KVM: VMX: Emulate reads and writes to CET MSRs
On Wed, Feb 03, 2021 at 07:34:14PM +0800, Yang Weijiang wrote:
> Add support for emulating read and write accesses to CET MSRs. CET MSRs
> are universally "special" as they are either context switched via
> dedicated VMCS fields or via XSAVES, i.e. no additional in-memory
> tracking is needed, but emulated reads/writes are more expensive.
>
> MSRs that are switched through XSAVES are especially annoying due to the
> possibility of the kernel's FPU being used in IRQ context. Disable IRQs
> and ensure the guest's FPU state is loaded when accessing such MSRs.
>
> Co-developed-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yang Weijiang <weijiang.yang@intel.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c | 105 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/x86/kvm/x86.h | 5 ++
> 2 files changed, 110 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> index cc60b1fc3ee7..694879c2b0b7 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> @@ -1787,6 +1787,66 @@ static int vmx_get_msr_feature(struct kvm_msr_entry *msr)
> }
> }
>
> +static void vmx_get_xsave_msr(struct msr_data *msr_info)
> +{
> + local_irq_disable();
> + if (test_thread_flag(TIF_NEED_FPU_LOAD))
> + switch_fpu_return();
> + rdmsrl(msr_info->index, msr_info->data);
> + local_irq_enable();
> +}
> +
> +static void vmx_set_xsave_msr(struct msr_data *msr_info)
> +{
> + local_irq_disable();
> + if (test_thread_flag(TIF_NEED_FPU_LOAD))
> + switch_fpu_return();
> + wrmsrl(msr_info->index, msr_info->data);
> + local_irq_enable();
> +}
> +
> +static bool cet_is_ssp_msr_accessible(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> + struct msr_data *msr)
> +{
> + u64 mask;
> +
> + if (!kvm_cet_supported())
> + return false;
> +
> + if (msr->host_initiated)
> + return true;
> +
> + if (!guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_SHSTK))
> + return false;
> +
> + if (msr->index == MSR_IA32_INT_SSP_TAB)
> + return true;
> +
> + mask = (msr->index == MSR_IA32_PL3_SSP) ? XFEATURE_MASK_CET_USER :
> + XFEATURE_MASK_CET_KERNEL;
> + return !!(vcpu->arch.guest_supported_xss & mask);
> +}
> +
> +static bool cet_is_control_msr_accessible(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> + struct msr_data *msr)
> +{
> + u64 mask;
> +
> + if (!kvm_cet_supported())
> + return false;
> +
> + if (msr->host_initiated)
> + return true;
> +
> + if (!guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_SHSTK) &&
> + !guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_IBT))
> + return false;
> +
> + mask = (msr->index == MSR_IA32_U_CET) ? XFEATURE_MASK_CET_USER :
> + XFEATURE_MASK_CET_KERNEL;
> + return !!(vcpu->arch.guest_supported_xss & mask);
> +}
> +
> /*
> * Reads an msr value (of 'msr_index') into 'pdata'.
> * Returns 0 on success, non-0 otherwise.
> @@ -1919,6 +1979,26 @@ static int vmx_get_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
> else
> msr_info->data = vmx->pt_desc.guest.addr_a[index / 2];
> break;
> + case MSR_IA32_S_CET:
> + if (!cet_is_control_msr_accessible(vcpu, msr_info))
> + return 1;
> + msr_info->data = vmcs_readl(GUEST_S_CET);
> + break;
> + case MSR_IA32_U_CET:
> + if (!cet_is_control_msr_accessible(vcpu, msr_info))
> + return 1;
> + vmx_get_xsave_msr(msr_info);
> + break;
> + case MSR_IA32_INT_SSP_TAB:
> + if (!cet_is_ssp_msr_accessible(vcpu, msr_info))
> + return 1;
> + msr_info->data = vmcs_readl(GUEST_INTR_SSP_TABLE);
> + break;
> + case MSR_IA32_PL0_SSP ... MSR_IA32_PL3_SSP:
> + if (!cet_is_ssp_msr_accessible(vcpu, msr_info))
> + return 1;
> + vmx_get_xsave_msr(msr_info);
> + break;
> case MSR_TSC_AUX:
> if (!msr_info->host_initiated &&
> !guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_RDTSCP))
> @@ -2188,6 +2268,31 @@ static int vmx_set_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
> else
> vmx->pt_desc.guest.addr_a[index / 2] = data;
> break;
> + case MSR_IA32_S_CET:
> + case MSR_IA32_U_CET:
> + if (!cet_is_control_msr_accessible(vcpu, msr_info))
> + return 1;
> + if (data & GENMASK(9, 6))
> + return 1;
> + if (msr_index == MSR_IA32_S_CET)
> + vmcs_writel(GUEST_S_CET, data);
> + else
> + vmx_set_xsave_msr(msr_info);
> + break;
> + case MSR_IA32_INT_SSP_TAB:
> + if (!cet_is_control_msr_accessible(vcpu, msr_info))
> + return 1;
> + if (is_noncanonical_address(data, vcpu))
> + return 1;
> + vmcs_writel(GUEST_INTR_SSP_TABLE, data);
> + break;
> + case MSR_IA32_PL0_SSP ... MSR_IA32_PL3_SSP:
> + if (!cet_is_ssp_msr_accessible(vcpu, msr_info))
> + return 1;
> + if ((data & GENMASK(2, 0)) || is_noncanonical_address(data, vcpu))

Sorry to revive this old thread. I'm working on the corresponding SVM
bits for shadow stack and I noticed the above check. Why isn't this
GENMASK(1, 0)? The *SSP MSRs should be a 4-byte aligned canonical
address meaning that just bits 1 and 0 should always be zero. I was
looking through the previous versions of the set and found that this
changed between versions 11 and 12, but I don't see any discussion
related to this on the list.

Thanks,
John

> + return 1;
> + vmx_set_xsave_msr(msr_info);
> + break;
> case MSR_TSC_AUX:
> if (!msr_info->host_initiated &&
> !guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_RDTSCP))
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.h b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.h
> index fd8c46da2030..16c661d94349 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.h
> @@ -288,6 +288,11 @@ static inline bool kvm_mpx_supported(void)
> == (XFEATURE_MASK_BNDREGS | XFEATURE_MASK_BNDCSR);
> }
>
> +static inline bool kvm_cet_supported(void)
> +{
> + return supported_xss & XFEATURE_MASK_CET_USER;
> +}
> +
> extern unsigned int min_timer_period_us;
>
> extern bool enable_vmware_backdoor;
> --
> 2.26.2
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-05-18 17:58    [W:0.271 / U:0.280 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site